喜歡就充值下載吧。。。資源目錄里展示的全都有，，下載后全都有,,請放心下載，================================== 【QQ：3278627871 可咨詢交流】 喜歡就充值下載吧。。。資源目錄里展示的全都有，，下載后全都有,,請放心下載，================================== 【QQ：3278627871 可咨詢交流】 喜歡就充值下載吧。。。資源目錄里展示的全都有，，下載后全都有,,請放心下載，================================== 【QQ：3278627871 可咨詢交流】

桂林電子科技大學(xué)畢業(yè)設(shè)計報告（論文）用紙 編號： 畢業(yè)設(shè)計(論文)外文翻譯 （原文） 院 （系）： 應(yīng)用科技學(xué)院 專 業(yè)： 機(jī)械設(shè)計及其自動化 學(xué)生姓名： 李雪梅 學(xué) 號： 0701120404 指導(dǎo)教師單位： 應(yīng)用科技學(xué)院 姓 名： 李銳鋒 職 稱： 講師 2011年 6 月 12 日 18 New Manufacturing Technologies INTRODUCTION Driven by international competition and aided by application of computer technology, manufacturing firms have been pursuing two principal approaches during the 1980's: * automation, and * integration. Automation is the substitution of machine for human function; integration is the reduction or elimination of buffers between physical or organizational entities. The strategy behind manufacturing firms' application of new automation technologies is multidimensional: * to liberate human resources for knowledge work, * to eliminate hazardous or unpleasant jobs, * to improve product uniformity, and * to reduce costs and variability. The execution of that strategy has lead firms automate away simple, repetitive, or unpleasant functions in their offices, factories, and laboratories. Integration, when used as an approach to improve quality, cost, and responsiveness to customers, requires that firms find ways to reduce physical, temporal, and organizational barriers among various functions. Such buffer reduction has been implemented by the elimination of waste, the substitution of information for inventory, the insertion of computer technology, or some combination of these. In most process industries - oil refining and papermaking, for example - automation and integration have been critical trends for decades. However, in discrete goods manufacture - electronics and automobiles, for example - significant movement in these directions is a recent phenomenon in the United States. This chapter defines, examines, and illustrates the application of technologies that support the trends toward more automation and integration in discrete goods manufacturing. We begin with a discussion of the technological hardware and software that has been evolving. We then look at six management challenges that must be addressed to support these trends. And, finally, we look at the issue of economic evaluation the new technologies. AUTOMATION IN MANUFACTURING As characterized, for example, by Toshiba, in their OME Works facility, automation in manufacturing can be divided into three categories: *factory automation, *engineering automation, and *planning and control automation. Automation in these three areas can occur independently, but coordination among the three, as is being pursued by this Toshiba facility, drives opportunities for computer integrated manufacturing, discussed below. Factory Automation Although software also plays a critical role, factory automation is typically described by the technological hardware used in manufacturing: robots, numerically controlled (NC) machine tools, and automated material handling systems. Increasingly, these technologies are used in larger, integrated systems, known as manufacturing cells or flexible manufacturing systems (FMS). The term robot refers to a piece of automated equipment, typically programmable, that can be used for moving material to be worked on (pick and place) or assembling components into a larger device. Robots are also used to substitute for direct human labor in the use of tools or equipment, as is done, for example, by a painting robot, or a welding robot, which both positions the welder and welds joints and seams. Robots can vary significantly in complexity, from simple single-axis programmable controllers to sophisticated multi-axis machines with microprocessor control and real-time, closed-loop feedback and adjustment. A numerically-controlled (NC) machine tool is a machine tool that can be run by a computer program that directs the machine in its operations. A stand-alone NC machine needs to have the workpieces, tools, and NC programs loaded and unloaded by an operator. However, once an NC machine is running a program on a workpiece, it requires significantly less operator involvement than a manually operated machine. A CNC (computer numerically-controlled) machine tool typically has a small computer dedicated to it, so that programs can be developed and stored locally. In addition, some CNC tools have automated parts loading and tool changing. CNC tools typically have real-time, on-line program development capabilities, so that operators can implement engineering changes rapidly. A DNC (distributed numerically-controlled) system consists of numerous CNC tools linked together by a larger computer system that downloads NC programs to the distributed machine tools. Such a system is necessary for the ultimate integration of parts machining with production planning and scheduling. Automated inspection of work can also be realized with, for example, vision systems or pressure-sensitive sensors. Inspection work tends to be tedious and prone to errors, especially in very high volume manufacturing settings, so it is a good candidate for automation. However, automated inspection (especially with diagnosis capability) tends to be very difficult and expensive. This situation, where automated inspection systems are expensive to develop, but human inspection is error-prone, demonstrates the value of automated manufacturing systems with very high reliability: In such systems, inspection and test strategies can be developed to exploit the high-reliability features, with the potential to reduce significantly the total cost of manufacture and test. Automated material handling systems move workpieces among work centers, storage locations, and shipping points. These systems may include autonomous guided vehicles, conveyor systems, or systems of rails. By connecting separate points in the production system, automated material handling systems serve an integration function, reducing the time delays between different points in the production process. These systems force process layout designers to depict clearly the path of each workpiece and often make it economical to transport workpieces in small batches, providing the potential for reduced wait times and idleness. A flexible manufacturing system (FMS) is a system that connects automated workstations with a material handling system to provide a multi-stage automated manufacturing capability for a wider range of parts than is typically made on a highly-automated, non-flexible, transfer line. These systems provide flexibility because both the operations performed at each work station and the routing of parts among work stations can be varied with software controls. The promise of FMS technology is to provide the capability for flexibility approaching that available in a job shop with equipment utilizations approaching what can be achieved with a transfer line. In fact, a FMS is a technology intermediate to these two extremes, but good management can help in pushing both frontiers simultaneously. Automated factories can differ significantly with respect to their strategic purpose and impact. Two examples, Matsushita and General Electric, may be instructive. In Osaka, Japan, Matsushita Electric Industrial Company has a plant that produces video cassette recorders (VCRs). The heart of the operation features a highly automated robotic assembly line with 100-plus work stations. Except for a number of trouble-shooting operators and process improvement engineers, this line can run, with very little human intervention, for close to 24 hours per day, turning out any combination of 200 VCR models. As of August 1988, the facility was underutilized; Matsushita was poised to increase production, by running the facility more hours per month, as demand materialized. In this situation, the marginal cost of producing more output is very low. Matsushita has effectively created a barrier to entry in the VCR industry, making it very difficult for entrants to compete on price. The second example is General Electric's Aircraft Engine Group Plant III, in Lynn, Massachusetts. This fully automated plant machines a small set of parts used by the Aircraft Engine Group's assembly plant. In contrast to Matsushita's plant, which provides strategic advantage in the VCR product market, the strategic advantage provided by GE's plant seems to address its labor market. Plant III's investment is now sunk. Eventually, it will run around the clock at very high utilization rates with a very small crew. As volume is ramped up, GE has the ability to use Plant III's capacity and cost structure as leverage with its unionized labor force which is currently making many of the parts that could eventually be transferred to Plant III. Thus, factory automation can address a variety of types of strategic needs, from product market considerations to labor market concerns. Engineering Automation From analyzing initial concepts to finalizing process plans, engineering functions that precede and support manufacturing are becoming increasingly automated. In many respects, engineering automation is very similar to factory automation; both phenomena can dramatically improve labor productivity and both increase the proportion of knowledge work for the remaining employees. However, for many companies, the economic payback structure and the justification procedures for the two technologies can be quite different. This difference between engineering automation and factory automation stems from a difference in the scale economies of the two types of technologies. In many settings, the minimum efficient scale for engineering automation is quite low. Investment in an engineering workstation can often be justified whether or not it is networked and integrated into the larger system. The firstorder improvement of the engineer's productivity is sufficient. For justification of factory automation, the reverse is more frequently the case. The term "island of automation" has come to connote a small investment in factory automation that, by itself, provides a poor return on investment. Many firms believe that factory automation investments must be well integrated and widespread in the operation before the strategic benefits of quality, lead time, and flexibility manifest themselves. Computer-aided design is sometimes used as an umbrella term for computer-aided drafting, computer-aided engineering analysis, and computer-aided process planning. These technologies can be used to automate significant amounts of the drudgery out of engineering design work, so that engineers can concentrate more of their time and energy on being creative and evaluating a wider range of possible design ideas. For the near future machines will not typically design products. The design function remains almost completely within the human domain. Computer-aided engineering allows the user to apply necessary engineering analysis, such as finite element analysis, to propose designs while they are in the drawing board stage. This capability can reduce dramatically the need for time-consuming prototype work up and test during the product development period. Computer-aided process planning helps to automate the manufacturing engineer's work of developing process plans for a product, once the product has been designed. Planning and Control Automation Planning and control automation is most closely associated with material requirements planning (MRP). Classical MRP develops production plans and schedules by using product bills of materials and production lead times to explode customer orders and demand forecasts netted against current and projected inventory levels. MRP II systems (second-generation MRP) are manufacturing resource planning systems that build on the basic MRP logic, but also include modules for shop floor control, resource requirements planning, inventory analysis, forecasting, purchasing, order processing, cost accounting, and capacity planning in various levels of detail. The economic considerations for investment in planning and control automation are more similar to that for investment in factory automation than that for engineering automation. The returns from an investment in an MRP II system can only be estimated by analyzing the entire manufacturing operation, as is also the case for factory automation. The integration function of the technology provides a significant portion of the benefits. INTEGRATION IN MANUFACTURING Four important movements in the manufacturing arena are pushing the implementation of greater integration in manufacturing: * Just-in-Time manufacturing (JIT), * Design for Manufacturability (DFM), * Quality Function Deployment (QFD), * Computer-integrated Manufacturing (CIM). Of these, CIM is the only one directly related to new computer technology. JIT, QFD, and DFM, which are organization management approaches, are not inherently computer-oriented and do not rely on any new technological developments. We will look at them briefly here because they are important to the changes that many manufacturing organizations are undertaking and because their integration objectives are very consonant with those of CIM. Just-in-Time Manufacturing (JIT) JIT embodies the idea of pursuing streamlined or continuous-flow production for the manufacture of discrete goods. Central to the philosophy is the idea of reducing manufacturing setup times, variability, inventory buffers, and lead times in the entire production system, from vendors through to customers, in order to achieve high product quality (conformity), fast and reliable delivery performance, and low costs. The reduction of time and inventory buffers between work stations in a factory, and between a vendor and its customers, creates a more integrated production system. People at each work center develop a better awareness of the needs and problems of their predecessors and successors. This awareness, coupled with a cooperative work culture, can help significantly with quality improvement and variability reduction. Investment in technology, that is, machines and computers, is not required for the implementation of JIT. Rather, JIT is a management technology that relies primarily on persistence in pursuing continuous incremental improvement in manufacturing operations. JIT accomplishes some of the same integration objectives achieved by CIM, without significant capital investment. Just as it is difficult to quantify the costs and benefits of investments in (hard) factory automation, it is also difficult to quantify costs and benefits of a "soft" technology such as JIT. A few recent models have attempted to do such a quantification, but that body of work has not been widely applied. Design for Manufacturability (DFM) This approach is sometimes called concurrent design or simultaneous engineering. DFM is a set of concepts related to pursuing closer communication and cooperation among design engineers, process engineers, and manufacturing personnel. In many engineering organizations, traditional product development practice was to have product designers finish their work before process designers could even start theirs. Products developed in such a fashion would inevitably require significant engineering changes as the manufacturing engineers struggled to find a way to produce the product in volume at low cost with high uniformity. Ouality Function Deployment (OFD) Closely related to Design for Manufacturability is the concept of Quality Function Deployment (QFD) which requires increased communication among product designers, marketing personnel, and the ultimate product users. In many organizations, once an initial product concept was developed, long periods would pass without significant interaction between marketing personnel and the engineering designers. As a result, as the designers confronted a myriad of technical decisions and tradeoffs, they would make choices with little marketing or customer input. Such practices often led to long delays in product introduction because redesign work was necessary once the marketing people finally got to see the prototypes. QFD formalizes interaction between marketing and engineering groups throughout the product development cycle, assuring that design decisions are made with full knowledge of all technical and market tradeoff considerations. Taken together, Design for Manufacturability and Quality Function Deployment promote integration among engineering, marketing, and manufacturing to reduce the total product development cycle and to improve the quality of the product design, as perceived by both the manufacturing organization and the customers who will buy the product. Like Just-in-Time, Design for Manufacturability and Quality Function Deployment are not primarily technological in nature. However, technologies such as Computer-aided Design can often be utilized as tools for fostering engineering/manufacturing/marketing integration. In a sense, such usage can be considered as the application of computer integrated manufacturing to implement these policy choices. Computer-interated Manufacturing (CIM) Computer-integrated manufacturing refers to the use of computer technology to link together all functions related to the manufacture of a product. CIM is therefore both an information system and a manufacturing control system. Because its intent is so all-encompassing, even describing CIM in a meaningful way can be difficult. We describe briefly one relatively simple conceptual model that covers the principal information needs and flows in a manufacturing firm. The model consists of two types of system components: * departments that supply and/or use information, and * processes that transform, combine, or manipulate information in some manner. The nine departments in the model are: 1. production 2. purchasing 3. sales/marketing 4. industrial and manufacturing engineering 5. product design engineering 6. materials management and production planning 7. controller/finance/accounting 8. plant and corporate management 9. quality assurance. The nine processes that transform, combine, or manipulate information in some manner are: 1. cost analysis 2. inventory analysis 3. product line analysis 4. quality analysis 5. workforce analysis 6. master scheduling 7. material requirements planning (MRP) 8. plant and equipment investment 9. process design and layout. To complete the specification of the model for a specific manufacturing system, one must catalog the information flows among the departments and information processes listed above. Such an information flow map can serve as a conceptual blueprint for CIM design, and can aid in visualizing the scope and function of a CIM information system. Design and implementation of a computer system to link together all of these information suppliers, processors, and users is typically a long, difficult, and expensive task. Such a system must serve the needs of a diverse group of users, and must typically bridge a variety of different software and hardware subsystems. The economic benefits from such a system come from faster and more reliable communication among employees within the organization and the resulting improvements in product quality and lead times. Since many of the benefits a CIM system are either intangible or very difficult to quantify, the decision to pursue a CIM program must be based on a long term, strategic commitment to improve manufacturing capabilities. Traditional return-on-investment evaluation procedures that characterize the decision-making processes of many U.S. manufacturing concerns will not justify the tremendous amount of capital and time required to aggressively pursue CIM. Despite the high cost and uncertainty associated with CIM implementation, most large U.S. manu