端蓋的落料、拉深、沖孔復(fù)合模設(shè)計(jì)【說(shuō)明書+CAD】,說(shuō)明書+CAD,端蓋的落料、拉深、沖孔復(fù)合模設(shè)計(jì)【說(shuō)明書+CAD】,沖孔,復(fù)合,設(shè)計(jì),說(shuō)明書,仿單,cad Int J Adv Manuf Technol (2008) 35:814 820 DOI 10.1007/s00170-006-0758-1 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Effects of punch load for elliptical deep drawing product of automotive parts Dong Hwan Park (2) 62 mm in the second process; and (3) 74 mm in the third process. The blank holding pressure was applied to 2 N/mm2. The lubricant for the operation of deep drawing used was a soluble oil lubrication for plastic working. Figure 2 presents the die geometry of the non-axisymmetric elliptical deep drawing process used in this test. 2.3 Scribed circle test The plane deformation resulting from the formation of a sheet metal workpiece can be measured by using an array of small diameter (10 mm) circles, printed on the blank surface in the critical strain regions. Figure 3 shows scribed circle marks of a non-axisymmetric blank. The circles deform into various shapes during forming, the major and minor axes indicate the direction of the major and minor Direction Young s module (Gpa) Yield strength (Mpa) Tensile strength (Mpa) Elongation (%) principal strains. Likewise, the measured dimensions are used to determine the major and minor principal strain magnitudes. This circular grid technique of measuring strains can be used to diagnose the causes of necking and 0 45 90 Average 50.9 54.5 58.5 54.6 182 200 205 195.7 426 433 412 423.7 48.4 41.4 48.2 46 fracture in industrial practice and to investigate whether these defects were caused by variations in the properties of the material, wear of the tools, changes in lubrication, or incorrect press settings. 816 Table 2 The experimental conditions for punch and die Profile radii Int J Adv Manuf Technol (2008) 35:814 820 First process Rd1 (mm) Second process Rd2 (mm) Third process Rd3 (mm) Remark (mm) Blank type 11.2 11.2 11.2 Rp=6.4 (A, B, C) 16 16 11.2 16 16 11.2 16 11.2 16 11.2 16 In non-axisymmetric elliptical deep drawing, three modes of forming regimes are found: draw, stretch, and plane strain. The draw mode for non-axisymmetric elliptical deep drawing could be defined when the major and minor strains are positive. The stretch mode could be defined when the major strain is positive and minor strain is negative, and plane strain mode could be defined when the major strain is positive and minor strain is zero. Figures 4, Fig. 2 Die geometry of elliptical deep drawing Fig. 3 Scribed circle marks of non-axisymmetric blank 5, and 6 present the major and minor strain distribution by scribed circle test after the first drawing according to the punch and die radii. From the result of the scribed circle test, the three deformation modes of the major and minor strains for non-axisymmetric elliptical deep drawing are shown in Fig. 7. The wall and flange of deformation zones are mainly applied to the draw mode, the punch head is applied to the plane strain mode, and the corner is applied to the stretch mode. 3 Blank shape design Generally, the trial-and-error method based on the experi- ences of skilled toolmakers, which increases the amount of time and costs, has been tried for developing the blank shape. Therefore, in this study, in order to design the blank shape which is equivalent to the surface area of the final product, Fig. 4 Major and minor strain distribution after the first drawing (Rp= 6.4 mm, Rd=6.4 mm) Int J Adv Manuf Technol (2008) 35:814 820 Fig. 5 Major and minor strain distribution after the first drawing (Rp= 6.4 mm, Rd=11.2 mm) we calculated the surface area of the final product by means of three-dimensional modeling 4 6. We used three kinds of blanks, which have an equivalent surface area to the final product. Figure 8 shows the geometry of shapes. The outline of the type A blank is larger than the type B and C blanks. The short side length of the type B blank is smaller than the type C blank. On the other hand, the long side length of the type B blank is a little larger than the type C blank. The process of the applied product in the experiment consists of seven stages of the deep drawing process and three stages of trimming, restriking etc. So, the total number of multi-deep drawing stages is 10. In this study, the ex- periment to measure punch load was performed from the first process to the third process. Figure 9 shows the prod- uct shape of each type blank according to process. Fig. 6 Major and minor strain distribution after the first drawing (Rp= 6.4 mm, Rd=16 mm) 817 Fig. 7 Three deformation modes of major and minor strains 4 Result and discussions Figure 10 shows the comparison of the punch load along the blank types in the first process. The punch profile radius (Rp) was fixed at 6.4 mm, the die profile radius (Rd1) of the first process was selected under two conditions, 11.2 and 16 mm. As a non-axisymmetric blank draws in the die cavity, the initial punch load increased rapidly causing inflow resis- tance of the long and short sides and then the maximum punch load is measured as 55% of the punch stroke. After the maximum punch load, the load was reduced and then forming was completed until the bottom dead center (BDC) of the punch stroke. Work hardening of the steel sheet occurred due to the increase of the amount of deformation as the punch arrives at the BDC of punch stroke. The punch stroke is finished at top dead center (TDC). The punch load of the type A blank measured relatively large in comparison with the type B and C blanks, and the punch loads of the type B and C blanks were similar. The area of the type A blank is on the whole large in comparison with the type B and C blanks. In other words, Fig. 8 Geometry of blank shapes Pu nc h loa d ( ton ) Pu nch lo ad (to n) 818 14 Int J Adv Manuf Technol (2008) 35:814 820 Type A 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 BDC Type B Type C TDC 0 23 46 69 92 Stroke (mm) (a) Punch load-stroke curve of each blank type (R d1=11.2) Fig. 9 Product shapes of each type blank 14 12 Type A Type B the contact surface area of the blank holder of the type A blank is larger than that of the type B and C blanks. Therefore, it is considered that the largest value of the 10 8 Type C punch load is measured at the type A blank where the high blank holding force is needed due to the large contact surface area of the blank holder. Table 3 shows the 6 4 TDC maximum punch load of the blank shapes along the die 2 BDC profile radii in the first process. The maximum punch load when Rd1=16 mm is smaller than when it is Rd1=11.2 mm. 0 0 23 46 69 92 Figure 11 shows the comparison of the punch load along the blank types in the second process. The punch profile radius (Rp) was fixed at 6.4 mm, the die profile radius (Rd1) of the first process was fixed at 16 mm, and the die profile radius (Rd2) of the second process was selected under two conditions, 11.2 and 16 mm. The maximum punch load was measured at 80% of the punch stroke when the type A, B blanks were used, and was measured at 60% of the punch stroke when the type C blank was used as shown in Fig. 6. As we compared with the punch load along each process, the punch load of the second process was smaller than the first process and the results of experiments showed that the punch load of the three types of blanks was similar. The punch load is small while the blank draws from the first to the second process due to the reduced drawing length. Figure 12 shows the comparison of the punch load along the blank types in the third process. The punch profile radius (Rp) was fixed at 6.4 mm, we compared the two conditions: the one die profile radii (Rd) of the first, second and third process was fixed at 16 mm; the other die profile Stroke (mm) (b) Punch load-stroke curve of each blank type (R d1=16) Fig. 10 Comparison of the punch load along the blank types in the first drawing (Rp=6.4 mm) punch stroke made progress when Rd=11.2 mm as shown in Fig. 12a. Figure 12b shows the similar punch load without a large difference about the three types, after BDC of the punch stroke. We attributed some difference of the punch load to friction between the punch and the steel sheet as shown in Figs. 10, 11 and 12. If the maximum punch load is larger than the fracture force (PF) to shear the steel sheet when forming a non-axisymmetric elliptical product, then Table 3 The maximum punch load of blank shapes along the die profile radii in the first process (Rp=6.4) (unit: tons) radii (Rd1) of the first, second and third process was fixed at 11.2 mm. The punch load of the type A blank was relatively large in comparison with the type B and C blanks, while the Die profile radii Rd1=11.2 Rd1=16 Type A 13.1 11.2 Type B 10.9 9.8 Type C 11.4 9.9 Pu nch lo ad (to n) Pu nch lo ad (to n) Pu nc h lo ad (to n) Pu nch lo ad (to n) Int J Adv Manuf Technol (2008) 35:814 820 819 10 8 Type A Type B Type C blank, a good product that has no discontinuous section could make from the type C blank. Therefore, we expect that the type C blank will be applied in the industrial field in the near future. 6 4 5 Conclusions 2 BDC TDC In this study, we carried out experiments on the deep- drawing product with steel sheets for drawability for an 0 0 31 62 93 124 elliptical product. Therefore, the conclusion of these Stroke (mm) (a) Punch load-stroke curve of each blank type (R d1=16, R d2=11.2) experiments clarified the influence of the profile radii of the punch and die and the blank shape on the punch load distribution for non-axisymmetric elliptical deep drawing products. The results are summarized as follows. 10 8 6 Type A Type B Type C 1. From the result of scribed circle test, the wall and flange of deformation zones are mainly applied to the draw mode, the punch head is applied to the plane strain mode, and the corner is applied to the stretch mode 10 Type A Type B 4 8 Type C 2 BDC TDC 6 0 0 31 62 93 124 4 Stroke (mm) (b) Punch load-stroke curve of each blank type (Rd1=16, R d2=16) 2 0 BDC TDC Fig. 11 Comparison of the punch load along the blank types in the 0 37 74 111 148 second drawing (Rp=6.4 mm) the fracture occurred at that time. Theoretically PF is calculated as follows. PF Ltsb 210 1:6 43:29 Stroke (mm) (a) Punch load-stroke curve of each blank type (R d1=11.2, R d2=11.2, R d3=11.2) 10 The fracture force (PF) was calculated using the drawing length (L) of the blanks. It is 14.5 tons. Therefore, the maximum punch load measured in the experiments, 13.1 tons, was performed without the fracture of the non- axisymmetric elliptical product. Because the type A blank is larger than the type B and C 8 6 4 Type A Type B Type C blanks, the blank holding force increased. Therefore, the 2 BDC TDC punch load of the type A blank shows a large value in every process due to an increase of the blank holding force. In 0 contrast to the type A blank, because the punch load of the 0 37 74 111 148 type B and C blanks is smaller than that of the type A blank, the blank holding force is reduced. Therefore, the punch load of the type B and C blanks shows a small value for every process due to the reduced blank holding force. Although the punch load is similar to that in the type B Stroke (mm) (b) Punch load-stroke curve of each blank type (R d1=16, R d2=16, R d2=16) Fig. 12 Comparison of the punch load along the blank types in the third process (Rp=6.4 mm) 820 2. We could see that the maximum punch load was reduced gradually as the process progressed 3. We could see that the maximum punch load of the type A blank had the largest value among the three kinds of blanks during the process and although the type C blank s punch load is similar to that of the type B blank, good products without discontinuous section could be obtained from the type C blank References 1. McCandless AJ, Bahrani AS (1979) Strain paths, limit strains and forming limit diagram. 7th NAMRC, SME, May 2000, pp 184-190 2. Kim DH (1998) Experimental study on minimizing wall thickness thinning for deep drawing of circular shells. J Korean Soc Tech Plastic 7(4):393 399 3. Majlessi SA, Lee D (1993) Deep drawing square-shape sheet metal parts, part 1: finite element analysis. ASME J Eng Ind 115:102 109 4. Marumo Y, Saiki H (1998) Estimation of the deep drawability of aluminum square cups by fracture forces. Met Mater Int 4(3):372 375 5. Park DH, Bae WR, Park SB, Kang SS (1999) An experimental study on optimization of blank shape in elliptical deep drawing process. J Korean Soc Prec Eng 16(10):101 108 6. Park DH, Bae WR, Park SB, Kang SS (2000) Application surface area calculating system for design of blank shape of deep drawing product. J Korean Soc Prec Eng 17(4):97 105 7. Yasunori Saotome, Kaname Yasuda, Hiroshi Kaga (2001) Micro- deep drawability of very thin sheet steels. J Mater Process Technol 113:641 647 8. Heo YM, Wang SH, Kim HY, Seo DG (2001) The effect of the drawbead dimensions of the weld-line movements in the deep drawing of taylor-welded blanks. J Mater Process Technol 113:686 691 Int J Adv Manuf Technol (2008) 35:814 820 9. Kapinski S (1996) Analytical and experimental analysis of deep drawing process for bimetal elements. J Mater Process Technol 60:197 200 10. Li R, Weinmann KJ (1999) Formability in non-symmetric aluminium panel drawing using active drawbeads. Annal CIRP 48(1):209 212 11. Park SH, Yoon JW, Yang DY, Kim YH (1999) Optimum blank design in sheet metal forming by the deformation path iteration method. Int J Mech Sci 41:1217 1232 12. Lee KS, Huh H (1998) Finite element simulation of three dimen- sional superplastic blow forming. Metal Mater Int 4(3):299 305 13. Yang DY, Lee SW, Kim JB, Yoon JW, Lee DW (1998) Holistic design and simulation system in sheet metal forming processes. Metal Mater Int 4(4):715 722 14. Cho CS, Lee CH, Huh H (1997) Design of process parameters in axisymmetric multi-step deep drawing by a finite element inverse method. J Korean Soc Tech Plastic 6(4):300 310 15. Yoon JW, Yang DY, Chung K, Barlat F (1999) A general elasto- plastic finite element formulation based on incremental deforma- tion theory for planar anisotropy and its application to sheet metal forming. Int J Mech Sci 15:35 67 16. Chen FK (1997) Analysis of an equivalent drawbead model for the finite element simulation of a stamping process. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 37(4):409 423 17. Hung YM, Li CL (1999) An elasto-plastic finite element analysis of the metal sheet redrawing process. J Mater Process Technol 89:331 338 18. Leu DK (1997) Prediction of the limiting drawing ratio and the maximum drawing load in cup drawing. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 37(2):201 213 19. Leu DK, Chen TC, Huang YM (1999) Influence of punch shapes on the collar-drawing process of sheet steel. J Mater Process Technol 88:134 146 20. Ceretti E, Giardini C, Maccarini G (1995) Theoretical and experimental analysis of non-axisymmetrical deep drawing. J Mater Process Technol 54:375 384 21. Doege E, El-Dsoki T, Seibert D (1995) Prediction of necking and wrinkling in sheet-metal forming. J Mater Process Technol 50:197 206 22. Rao KP, Mohan EVR (2001) A unified test for evaluating material parameters for use in the modeling of sheet metal forming. J Mater Process Technol 113:725 731