壓縮包內(nèi)含有CAD圖紙和說明書,均可直接下載獲得文件，所見所得，電腦查看更方便。Q 197216396 或 11970985
任務(wù)書
題 目
多功能小型拖拉機(jī)變速器設(shè)計(jì)
論文時(shí)間
20**年2月25日至 20**年6月14日
課題的主要內(nèi)容及要求(含技術(shù)要求、圖表要求等)
本課題要求應(yīng)用有關(guān)科學(xué)知識(shí)，設(shè)計(jì)一種適用于實(shí)施農(nóng)業(yè)內(nèi)作用多功能小型拖拉機(jī)的變速器，其具體要求為：
1.操縱方式：機(jī)械式。
2.變速檔數(shù)8+2，速度范圍2.12-28.12km/h，爬行檔裝置，速度0.41-1.36km/h。
3. 發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī)：10W，2000r/min
課題的實(shí)施的方法、步驟及工作量要求
1.查閱有關(guān)資料和設(shè)計(jì)手冊，了解本課題有關(guān)的科學(xué)知識(shí)。
2.確定方案，擬定滿足要求的結(jié)構(gòu)原理圖；
3.確定結(jié)構(gòu)設(shè)計(jì)方案，完成總裝配圖及零件圖，完成圖紙工作量累計(jì)3張零號(hào)圖紙以上；
4.完成外文翻譯漢字5000字以上；
5.完成畢業(yè)設(shè)計(jì)說明書（1萬漢字以上）。
指定參考文獻(xiàn)
[1].羅正江，郭秀龍，劉道軍.迪爾 4450型拖拉機(jī)全負(fù)載換擋機(jī)構(gòu)的構(gòu)造與原理，農(nóng)機(jī)使用與維修[M].2002
[2].郭建新，梁秀麗.小型拖拉機(jī)傳動(dòng)系的改進(jìn)山東農(nóng)機(jī)[M].2001
[3].汪愷主編.機(jī)械設(shè)計(jì)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)應(yīng)用手冊[M].北京：機(jī)械工業(yè)出版社.1996
[4].吉林工業(yè)大學(xué)汽車教研室編著.汽車設(shè)計(jì)[M].北京：人民交通出版社.1990
[5].倪計(jì)民.汽車內(nèi)燃機(jī)原理[M].上海：同濟(jì)大學(xué)出版社.1997
[6].許國明.中國農(nóng)機(jī)化報(bào)[N].北京：經(jīng)濟(jì)日報(bào)出版社.2000
[7].拖拉機(jī)研究所.拖拉機(jī)設(shè)計(jì)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)手冊[M].中國工業(yè)出版社
[8].濮良貴，紀(jì)名剛.機(jī)械設(shè)計(jì)[M].高等教育出版社
[9].申永勝.機(jī)械原理教程[M].清華大學(xué)出版社
[10].朱龍根.機(jī)械系統(tǒng)設(shè)計(jì)[M].機(jī)械工業(yè)出版社
[11].西北工業(yè)大學(xué)工程制圖教研室，畫法幾何及機(jī)械制圖[M].陜西科學(xué)技術(shù)出版社
[12].機(jī)械工程手冊[M].中國北京：機(jī)械工業(yè)出版社
[13].機(jī)械輸送機(jī)機(jī)械設(shè)計(jì)手冊[M].中國北京：中國鐵道出版社
[14].機(jī)械化運(yùn)輸設(shè)計(jì)手冊[M].中國北京：機(jī)械工業(yè)出版社，1997年第一版
[15].運(yùn)輸機(jī)械設(shè)計(jì)選用手冊[M].中國：化學(xué)工業(yè)出版社，1999年第二版
[16].王昆主編，機(jī)械設(shè)計(jì)課程設(shè)計(jì)[M].1992年.華中理工大學(xué)出版社
[17].許本安，李秀治主編.材料力學(xué)[M].1988年，上海交通大學(xué)出版社
畢業(yè)設(shè)計(jì)(論文)進(jìn)度計(jì)劃(以周為單位)
第 1 周（20**年2月25日----20**年3月3日）：
檢查寒假外文翻譯情況，下達(dá)具體畢業(yè)設(shè)計(jì)任務(wù)，指導(dǎo)學(xué)生撰寫開題報(bào)告，熟悉設(shè)計(jì)內(nèi)容，查閱有關(guān)資料
第 2 周——第 3 周（20**年3月4日----20**年3月17日）：
參觀拖拉機(jī)實(shí)體，增加實(shí)踐認(rèn)識(shí)，討論方案并確定設(shè)計(jì)方案，完成結(jié)構(gòu)原理圖及有關(guān)設(shè)計(jì)計(jì)算
第 4 周——第 5 周（20**年3月18日----20**年3月31日）：
完成拖拉機(jī)變速器設(shè)計(jì)方案，擬定變速器設(shè)計(jì)草圖
第 6 周——第 7 周（20**年4月1日----20**年4月14日）：
完成變速器總圖及有關(guān)零件設(shè)計(jì)圖
第 8 周（20**年4月9日----20**年4月21日）：
提交第1-8周的《指導(dǎo)記錄表》和已做的畢業(yè)設(shè)計(jì)內(nèi)容，由指導(dǎo)老師初審后上交學(xué)院
第 9 周——第 13 周（20**年4月22日----20**年5月26日）：
在指導(dǎo)老師指導(dǎo)下修改并完成設(shè)計(jì)，完成相關(guān)設(shè)計(jì)圖紙，同時(shí)撰寫畢業(yè)設(shè)計(jì)說明書，并提交指導(dǎo)老師初審
第 14 周——第 16 周（20**年5月27日----20**年6月14日）：
修改畢業(yè)設(shè)計(jì)圖紙及說明書，完成后參加畢業(yè)答辯
備注
注：表格欄高不夠可自行增加。此表由指導(dǎo)教師在畢業(yè)設(shè)計(jì)（論文）工作開始前填寫，每位畢業(yè)生兩份，一份發(fā)給學(xué)生，一份交院（系）留存。
畢業(yè)設(shè)計(jì)(論文)外文資料翻譯
院 系
專 業(yè)
學(xué)生姓名
班級學(xué)號(hào)
外文出處
www.sciencedirect.com
指導(dǎo)教師評語：
指導(dǎo)教師簽名：
年 月 日
外文原文
Applied iterative closest point algorithm to automated inspection of gear box tooth
Salim Boukebbab, Hichem Bouchenitfa, Hamlaoui Boughouas, Jean Marc Linares
Abstract
The development of a complete system and quality control of manufactured parts requires the coordination of a set complex processes allowing data acquisition, their dimensional evaluation and their comparison with a reference model. By definition, the parts inspection is the comparison between measurements results and the theoretical surfaces definition in order to check the conformity after manufacturing phase. The automation of this function is currently based on alignment methods of measured points resulting from an acquisition process and these nominal surfaces, in a way that they “fit best”. The distance between nominal surface and measured points(i.e. form defects) calculated after alignment stages are necessary for the correction of the manufacturing parameters(Henke, Summerhays, Baldwin, Cassou, &Brown, 1999).In the work, a method for automated control based on association of complex surfaces to a cloud points using the Iterative Closest Point(I.C.P)algorithm for alignment stage is proposed. An industrial application concerning a tooth gear manufactured in our country’s tractor engines is presented.
2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: CMMs; Complex surfaces; ICP; Gear; Manufacturing process
1. Introduction
The design and manufacture of complex surfaces became a current practice in industry. These surfaces can be conceived by a direct method based on the use of Computer Aided Design(CAD)software , or an indirect method which consists in a treatment of a discrete representation of an object model to obtain its CAD model. This last can be obtained throughout an acquisition process, allowing then a much more rapid safeguard, modification, manufacture, automatic inspection, prototypes checking and a much easier analysis (Lai & Ueng, 2000).
The last year, the development process has covered all automated production phases, from design to the parts inspection passing by manufacture. Since the design and the manufacture of complex surfaces became a current practice in industry, then the problem related to the parts conformity are being felt more and more.
The automation and the flexibility of a three-dimensional measurement machine with or without contact have made a considerable reduction in the acquisition time and the measurements treatment. In the current state of the metrology software, the inspection of elementary surfaces (plane, cylinder, cone, etc.)became a very easy practice. On the other hand the inspection of complex surfaces remains a problem to overcome (Tucker & Kurfess, 2003).
The ascending complexity of parts geometry and the need for reducing production costs impose the use of more powerful tools for the inspection of complex parts surfaces, for a better service functionality description during its assembly with the conjugate mechanism parts (Tholath & Radhakrishnan, 1999). Our work is placed accordingly and consists to establish a procedure for modeling and inspecting complex parts surfaces, enabling the correction of relative deviations within production means.
The method used is based on the iterative-closest-point(ICP)algorithm, which is a well-known method for registering a 3D set of points to a 3D model that minimizes the sum of squared residual errors between the set and the model. This choice is motivated by the robustness of this method and it is important to underline here that; no attempt to implement it within Coordinate Measuring Machines (CMMs) software has been reported in the three-dimensional metrology literature.
A numerical application treating the case of a tooth of the toothed wheel which equips the gear box tractor manufactured at the engines and tractors factory in our country is presented, the comparison between the real surface obtained by acquisition and the ideal model has led to the calculation of the form defects on the two flanks of the tooth gear.
2. Problems and adopted algorithm
The principle of the software of Coordinate Measuring Machines consists generally in individually associating an elementary mathematical model (plane, cylinder, etc) to each digitized surface. The function to be minimized is based on the distance di between the digitized point Mi and the theoretical surface (Fig.2).
As already pointed out in the introduction, in current state of the metrology software, the inspection of elementary surfaces (plane, cylinder, cone, etc,) is not a problem, and most CMMs correct remaining alignment deviations numerically (alignment means to evaluate an optimum transformation T mapping the measured points to the corresponding nominal points in a way that they “fit best”) (Gogh et al, 2003). On the other hand the inspections of surfaces which have geometries of a higher complexity like gears, sculptured surfaces etc.represents a major challenge (Goch & Tschudi, 1992; Pommer, 2002). It is to this objective that our work is directed, and consists in the development of a procedure of a procedure for modeling and inspecting complex surfaces with an aim of correcting the errors cumulated during the manufacturing phase (Portman & Shuster (1997)). For this case, the ICP (Iterative Closest Point) algorithm method will be used.
The iterative-closest-point (ICP) algorithm of Besl and McKay (1992) is a well-known method for registering a 3D model that minimizes the sum of squared residual errors between the set and the model, i.e. it finds a registration that is locally best in a least-squares sense (Bergevin, Laurendeau, & Poussart, 1995; Ma & Ellis, 2003). Its main goal is to find the optimal rigid transformation which will corresponds as well as possible a cloud points P to a geometrical model M, using the singular value decomposition function (SVD) (Fig.3).
The parameters of the rigid transformation between the sets of points PI and PII must minimize the cost function:
2
Where: P’ is a point from P’P I is a point from P’’ associated with Pi’Tt the rigid transformation.
A rigid transformation Tt consists of the rotation matrix [R] and the translation vector {T} giving the iterative transformation Pi’’=[R]*Pi’+ {T} (Pi’ will be transformed into a point Pi’’).
This algorithm requires an initial estimate of the registration; because the computation speed and registration accuracy depend on how this initial estimate is chosen (Ma&Ellis, 2003). For this, we were mainly based on the algorithm proposed by Moron (1996) to which some changes have been made in order to make it simpler while keeping a maximum of its performances Fig. 4.
In this algorithm, we have to determine the six degrees of freedom including the three for rotation and the other three for translation by ICP. Which the three dimensional translation vector has simply three parameters as {T} = (tx, ty, tz) T, the rotation matrix is apparently composed of nine elements which should go along with six conditions for orthonormality.
A simple iterative optimization based on the least square principle can not guarantee this orthonormality (Kaneko, Kondo, & Miyamoto, 2003). Hence, ICP employs unit quaternion (q0; q1; q2; q3) for representing the rotation parameters in order to reduce this problem.
The unit quaternion is used to compute a rotation about the unit vector n by an angle θ:
, with q00 and ; q02+q12+q22+q32=1
Then the rotation matrix [R] is defined by:
The optimal motion ([R]; {T}) is computed by the unit quaternion method due to Horn (Eggert, Lorusso, & Fisher, 1997). The same method was used in the original version of ICP (Besl & Mckay, 1992). There are different analytical ways to calculate the 3D rigid motion that minimizes the sum of the squared distances between the corresponding points. In Eggert et al. (1997), four such techniques were compared and unit quaternion method was found to be robust with respect to noise, stable in presence of degenerate data and relatively (Chetverikov, Stepanov, & Krsek, 2005).
3. Presentation of the algorithm
Since the presentation of the I.C.P algorithm by Besl and Mckay, many variants have been introduced, which affect one or more stages of the original algorithm to try to increase its performances specially accuracy and speed, giving birth to several alternatives of I.C.P. algorithm (Kaneko et al., 2003). Some of these variants (such as Rusinkiewicz et al. (2001)) expand also the abbreviation to the iterative corresponding point claiming that this would better suit the algorithm (Sablatnig & Kampel, 2002). In order, to make a choice of an algorithm, several criteria should be checked: speed, accuracy, stability, robustness, and simplicity. The importance of the one or other of those criteria depends on the use and application of the final program.
The development of a complete system of inspection and quality control of manufactured parts requires the coordination of a set complex processes allowing data acquisition, their dimensional evaluation and their comparison with a reference model. For that it is essential to make profitable some conceptual knowledge relating not only to the object to be analyzed, but also to its environment. In our case, the objective of the present work consist in establishing an automation procedure for modeling and inspecting complex parts surfaces, enabling the correction of relative deviations within manufacturing parameters, then the criteria adopted are : speedy convergence, system robustness, and interface simplicity.
The new algorithm can be summarized by the following procedure.
1. Make a random selection of a subset of points.
2. Calculate the projection of the selected points.
3. Calculate the optimal rigid transformation with SVD method.
4. Apply the transformation to the selected points.
5. Evaluate the quality of alignment by LMS estimator.
6. If alignment quality is good, calculate transformation and apply it to the whole of available points.
7. Repeat the steps from 1 to 6 until convergence.
The conceptual structure of our program is presented in Fig 4.
We note here that the algorithm structure is very simple; it is made up of a principle program which contains a loop to carry out the iterations and another one to estimate the quality of the rigid transformation by the LMS estimator (Least Median Squares) (Rousseau & Leroy, 1987). In this program we also find three calls functions which are: the CPT function which calculates the projection of the points on the ideal model of surface in STL format (Fig.5)，the SVD function which calculates the optimal rigid transformation; and finally the RT function useful for calculating the initial rigid transformation; because as already pointed out, the algorithm requires an initial estimate solution of registration; and the computation speed and registration accuracy depend on how this initial estimate is chosen (Ma & Ellis, 2003).
The STL format is generally obtained by a triangulation of an exact model using CAD software which gives a data file in STL format (Fig.6). Where a Triangular facet is defined by the co-ordinates of the three vertexes and its normal directed towards the object free side.
It should be noted that, the bigger is the number of triangles in STL model the less is the approximation errors (Fig.7).
The number of triangles and their distributions are function of the surface curvature and modeling tolerated error.
翻譯譯文
運(yùn)用點(diǎn)算法反復(fù)自動(dòng)檢測齒輪箱齒輪
Salim Boukebbab Hichem Bouchenitfa Hamlaoui Boughouas Jean Marc Linares
摘要：
一個(gè)完整的系統(tǒng)的開發(fā)和制造的零部件的質(zhì)量控制的一組復(fù)雜的過程，使數(shù)據(jù)采集，其尺寸的評估和比較一個(gè)參考模型，需要協(xié)調(diào)。根據(jù)定義，零件檢查之間的比較，以便檢查是否符合制造階段后的測量結(jié)果和理論表面定義。從收購的過程和這些標(biāo)稱的表面，測量點(diǎn)的方式，他們“最合適”的比對方法的基礎(chǔ)上，目前此功能的自動(dòng)化。之間的標(biāo)稱表面和測量點(diǎn)（即窗體缺陷）取向階段后，計(jì)算出的距離是必要的校正的制造參數(shù)（亨克，Summerhays，鮑德溫，Cassou布朗，1999）。在工作中，一個(gè)方法的自動(dòng)化控制基于使用迭代最近點(diǎn)（ICP）算法對準(zhǔn)階段的一個(gè)點(diǎn)云數(shù)據(jù)復(fù)雜曲面的關(guān)聯(lián)。在我國的拖拉機(jī)發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī)制造有關(guān)的齒齒輪工業(yè)應(yīng)用。
關(guān)鍵詞：CMMs , 復(fù)曲面， ICP ，齒輪 ，制造業(yè)程序
1、 緒論
復(fù)雜型面的設(shè)計(jì)和制造成為一個(gè)行業(yè)現(xiàn)行做法?？梢栽O(shè)想，這些表面的，直接的方法，使用計(jì)算機(jī)輔助設(shè)計(jì)（CAD）軟件，或間接的方法，其中包含一個(gè)對象模型來獲得其CAD模型的離散表示在治療的基礎(chǔ)上。這最后可以得到整個(gè)收購過程中，允許然后更快速的保障，修改，制造，自動(dòng)檢測，原型檢查和更容易的分析（黎翁，2000年）。
過去的一年，在發(fā)展過程中已覆蓋了所有的自動(dòng)化生產(chǎn)階段，從設(shè)計(jì)到零件的檢驗(yàn)，通過由制造。由于設(shè)計(jì)和制造復(fù)雜曲面成為一個(gè)在行業(yè)目前的做法，那么相關(guān)的部分整合的問題正在越來越感覺到。
帶或不帶接觸的三維測量機(jī)的自動(dòng)化和靈活性在時(shí)間的采集和治療的測量上已經(jīng)有了顯著的降低。在當(dāng)前狀態(tài)下的測量軟件，檢查的基本的表面（平面，圓柱體，圓錐體等）成為一個(gè)非常方便的做法。另一方面復(fù)雜的表面的檢查仍然是一個(gè)問題，需要得以克服（塔克＆Kurfess，2003年）。
升序復(fù)雜的零件的幾何形狀和降低生產(chǎn)成本的需要施加的更強(qiáng)大的工具的使用復(fù)雜的零件的表面的檢查中，在組裝過程中的共軛機(jī)制份（Tholath＆拉達(dá)克里希南，1999）為更好的服務(wù)功能的詳細(xì)描述。我們的工作放在相應(yīng)地，包括建立復(fù)雜的零件表面建模和檢查，使在生產(chǎn)手段的相對偏差校正的過程。
所使用的方法是根據(jù)迭代最近點(diǎn)（ICP）算法，這是一個(gè)眾所周知的方法，注冊一個(gè)3D的點(diǎn)集的3D模型集和模型之間的殘余誤差的平方的總和最小化。這種選擇是出于這種方法的魯棒性，重要的是在此強(qiáng)調(diào)，沒有試圖去實(shí)現(xiàn)它在坐標(biāo)測量機(jī)（CMM）的軟件已經(jīng)在三維的計(jì)量文獻(xiàn)報(bào)道。
裝備在我國的發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī)和拖拉機(jī)廠生產(chǎn)的拖拉機(jī)齒輪箱齒輪的齒治療的情況下，通過收購獲得的實(shí)際面和理想的模型之間的比較的數(shù)值應(yīng)用的計(jì)算上的兩個(gè)側(cè)面的齒齒輪的形式缺陷。
2.問題及運(yùn)算法則
他的原則三坐標(biāo)測量機(jī)的軟件通常包括在單獨(dú)一個(gè)基本的數(shù)學(xué)模型（平面，圓柱等）相關(guān)聯(lián)的每個(gè)數(shù)字化的表面。以最小化的功能的基礎(chǔ)上的數(shù)字化的點(diǎn)（Mi）和理論的表面（圖2）之間的距離di。
已經(jīng)指出，在當(dāng)前狀態(tài)下的測量軟件，在介紹基本的表面（平面，圓柱，圓錐等）的檢查是沒有問題的，最三坐標(biāo)測量機(jī)正確剩余的對準(zhǔn)偏差數(shù)值（校準(zhǔn)手段來評估一個(gè)最佳變換T的測量點(diǎn)映射到相應(yīng)的額定點(diǎn)的方式，他們“最合適”）（梵高等人，2003）。另一方面，檢查表面有齒輪等提出了更高的復(fù)雜性，復(fù)雜曲面的幾何形狀etc.represents一個(gè)重大的挑戰(zhàn)（九策楚迪，1992年;波默，2002年）。它是實(shí)現(xiàn)這一目標(biāo)，我們的工作指示，在發(fā)展的一個(gè)程序的一個(gè)程序，用于建模和檢查，一個(gè)目的是校正的誤差累積（波特曼＆舒斯特（1997））在制造階段的復(fù)雜的表面組成。在這種情況下，ICP（迭代最近點(diǎn)）算法的方法將被使用。
迭代的最近點(diǎn)（ICP）算法Besl和麥基（1992）是一種公知的方法，用于登記的3D模型集和模型之間的殘余誤差的平方的總和最小化，例如，它找到一個(gè)注冊當(dāng)?shù)刈詈迷谧钚《艘饬x上（Bergevin，Laurendeau，Poussart，1995年，馬和埃利斯，2003）。它的主要目標(biāo)是找到最佳的剛性，這將對應(yīng)的轉(zhuǎn)換以及云計(jì)算點(diǎn)P的幾何模型M，利用奇異值分解函數(shù)（SVD）（圖3）。
2
點(diǎn)PI和PII套之間的剛體變換的參數(shù)必須最大限度地降低成本的功能：
其中：P'是I是一個(gè)點(diǎn)從P點(diǎn)從P'P“與Pi'Tt剛體變換。
一個(gè)的剛體變換TT的旋轉(zhuǎn)矩陣[R]和平移向量{T}提供的迭代轉(zhuǎn)變PI“= [R]* PI+{T}（曹丕”將被改造成一個(gè)點(diǎn)Pi“）。
該算法需要一個(gè)初始估計(jì)登記手續(xù);因?yàn)橛?jì)算速度和配準(zhǔn)精度取決于這個(gè)初步估計(jì)被選中（馬和埃利斯，2003）。對于這一點(diǎn)，我們主要是基于倫（1996）所提出的算法，其中一些已經(jīng)作了修改，以便使其更簡單，同時(shí)保持其性能最大。圖4。
在該算法中，我們要確定的六個(gè)自由度，包括三個(gè)旋轉(zhuǎn)和其他三個(gè)翻譯ICP。哪個(gè)的三維平移向量具有簡單的三個(gè)參數(shù)，{T}=（TX，TY與tz）T中，顯然是由9個(gè)元素應(yīng)隨著六個(gè)條件正交性去旋轉(zhuǎn)矩陣。
一個(gè)簡單的迭代優(yōu)化的最小二乘原理的基礎(chǔ)上，不能保證這一點(diǎn)的正交性（金子，近藤，與宮本，2003年）。因此，ICP采用四元數(shù)（q0，q1，q2，q3）為代表的旋轉(zhuǎn)參數(shù)，以減少這個(gè)問題。
單位四元數(shù)被用來計(jì)算單位矢量n的角度θ的旋轉(zhuǎn)約：
?，其中q0 0和q02+ q12+ q22+ q32 =1;
然后旋轉(zhuǎn)矩陣[R]被定義為：
最佳運(yùn)動(dòng)（[R]{T}）計(jì)算的單位四元數(shù)法由于喇叭（艾格特，Lorusso醫(yī)師與其與Fisher，1997）。用同樣的方法在原有版本的ICP（BESL麥凱，1992年）。有不同的分析方法來計(jì)算的對應(yīng)點(diǎn)之間的距離的平方的總和最小化的3D剛體運(yùn)動(dòng)。在艾格特等。 （1997年），四等技術(shù)進(jìn)行了比較，發(fā)現(xiàn)四元數(shù)法是強(qiáng)大的，對于噪聲，穩(wěn)定中存在的退化數(shù)據(jù)和相對“（切特韋里科夫，斯捷潘諾夫，Krsek的，2005年）。
3.算法的介紹
自ICP算法Besl和麥凱的介紹后，有很多種說法被介紹，從而影響一個(gè)或多個(gè)階段，對原有算法設(shè)法提高其性能特別的精度和速度，分娩的ICP幾種選擇算法（Kaneko等人，2003年）。這些變體中的一些（如Rusinkiewicz等人（2001））的擴(kuò)大也縮寫迭代聲稱，這將更好地適應(yīng)的的算法（Sablatnig＆Kampel，2002）的對應(yīng)點(diǎn)。為了使選擇的算法，有幾個(gè)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，應(yīng)檢查：速度，精度，穩(wěn)定性，魯棒性和簡單。這些標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的一個(gè)或其他的重要性取決于最終的程序的使用和應(yīng)用。
一組復(fù)雜的過程，使數(shù)據(jù)采集，其尺寸的評估和比較一個(gè)參考模型，一個(gè)完整的系統(tǒng)制造的零部件的檢測和質(zhì)量控制的發(fā)展需要協(xié)調(diào)。為此，它是必不可少的，使有利可圖的一些概念方面的知識(shí)，不僅要分析的對象，但也給它的環(huán)境。在我們的例子中，目前的工作目標(biāo)包括建立一個(gè)自動(dòng)化過程進(jìn)行建模和檢查復(fù)雜的零件表面，使制造參數(shù)內(nèi)的相對偏差修正，然后采用的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)是：收斂速度快，系統(tǒng)的可靠性，界面簡潔明了。
新算法可以概括為以下步驟：
1． 一個(gè)隨機(jī)選擇的一個(gè)子集點(diǎn)。
2． 計(jì)算的選定點(diǎn)的投影
3． 計(jì)算出最佳的剛性變換與SVD方法。
4． 應(yīng)用轉(zhuǎn)型到選定的點(diǎn)。
5． 評估LMS估計(jì)質(zhì)量的對齊方式。
6． 如果對齊質(zhì)量好，計(jì)算轉(zhuǎn)型，并把它應(yīng)用到整個(gè)可用點(diǎn)。
7． 重復(fù)步驟1到6，直到收斂。
我們的計(jì)劃是在圖4的概念結(jié)構(gòu)。
我們注意到，該算法的結(jié)構(gòu)非常簡單，它是由一個(gè)原則方案，其中包含一個(gè)循環(huán)進(jìn)行迭代和另一個(gè)估計(jì)質(zhì)量的剛體變換估計(jì)的LMS（最小中位數(shù)平方）（盧梭＆樂華，1987）。在這個(gè)程序中，我們也發(fā)現(xiàn)三個(gè)電話功能分別是：計(jì)算上的點(diǎn)的投影表面的理想模型的STL格式（圖5），計(jì)算最佳的剛性變換的SVD功能，CPT功能，最后是RT功能，可用于計(jì)算初始剛體變換，因?yàn)檎缫呀?jīng)指出的，該算法需要注冊一個(gè)初步的估算解決方案;和運(yùn)算速度和配準(zhǔn)精度取決于這個(gè)初步估計(jì)被選中（馬和埃利斯，2003）。
STL格式通常是通過三角測量的精確模型使用CAD軟件，該軟件提供了一個(gè)數(shù)據(jù)文件中的STL格式（圖6）。凡三角刻面所定義的坐標(biāo)的三個(gè)頂點(diǎn)和其正常朝向的對象自由側(cè)。
應(yīng)當(dāng)指出的是，STL模型的越少，是近似誤差（圖7）的三角形的數(shù)量越大。
三角形的數(shù)量及其分布的表面曲率和建模允許誤差的功能。