《高速帶式輸送機的設(shè)計_外文翻譯》由會員分享，可在線閱讀，更多相關(guān)《高速帶式輸送機的設(shè)計_外文翻譯（28頁珍藏版）》請在裝配圖網(wǎng)上搜索。

1、附件A esign of High Speed Belt Conveyors G. Lodewijks, The Netherlands. SUMMARY This paper discusses aspects of high-speed belt conveyor design. The capacity of a belt conveyor is determined by the belt speed given a belt width and troughing angle. Belt speed selection however is limited by practi

2、cal considerations, which are discussed in this paper. The belt speed also affects the performance of the conveyor belt, as for example its energy consumption and the stability of it's running behavior. A method is discussed to evaluate the energy consumption of conveyor belts by using the loss fact

3、or of transport. With variation of the belt speed the safety factor requirements vary, which will affect the required belt strength. A new method to account for the effect of the belt speed on the safety factor is presented. Finally, the impact of the belt speed on component selection and on the des

4、ign of transfer stations is discussed. 1 INTRODUCTION Past research has shown the economical feasibility of using narrower, faster running conveyor belts versus wider, slower running belts for long overland belt conveyor systems. See for example [I]-[5]. Today, conveyor belts running at speeds aro

5、und 8 m/s are no exceptions. However, velocities over 10 m/s up to 20 m/s are technically (dynamically) feasible and may also be economically feasible. In this paper belt speeds between the 10 and 20 m/s are classified as high. Belt speeds below the 10 m/s are classified as low. Using high belt spe

6、eds should never be a goal in itself. If using high belt speeds is not economically beneficial or if a safe and reliable operation is not ensured at a high belt speed then a lower belt speed should be selected. Selection of the belt speed is part of the total design process. The optimum belt convey

7、or design is determined by static or steady state design methods. In these methods the belt is assumed to be a rigid, inelastic body. This enables quantification of the steady-state operation of the belt conveyor and determination of the size of conveyor components. The specification of the steady-s

8、tate operation includes a quantification of the steady-state running belt tensions and power consumption for all material loading and relevant ambient conditions. It should be realized that finding the optimum design is not a one-time effort but an iterative process [6]. Design fine-tuning, determi

9、nation of the optimum starting and stopping procedures, including determination of the required control algorithms, and determination of the settings and sizes of conveyor components such as drives, brakes and flywheels, are determined by dynamic design methods. In these design methods, also referre

10、d to as dynamic analyses, the belt is assumed to be a three-dimensional (visco-) elastic body. A three dimensional wave theory should be used to study time dependent transmission of large local force and displacement disturbances along the belt [7]. In this theory the belt is divided into a series o

11、f finite elements. The finite elements incorporate (visco-) elastic springs and masses. The constitutive characteristics of the finite elements must represent the rheological characteristics of the belt. Dynamic analysis produces the belt tension and power consumption during non-stationary operation

12、, like starting and stopping, of the belt conveyor. This paper discusses the design of high belt-speed conveyors, in particular the impact of using high belt speeds on the performance of the conveyor belt in terms of energy consumption and safety factor requirements. Using high belt speeds also req

13、uires high reliability of conveyor components such as idlers to achieve an acceptable component life. Another important aspect of high-speed belt conveyor design is the design of efficient feeding and discharge arrangements. These aspects will be discussed briefly. 2 BELTSPEED 2.1 BELT SPEED SELEC

14、TION The lowest overall belt conveyor cost occur in the range of belt widths of 0.6 to 1.0 m [2]. The required conveying capacity can be reached by selection of a belt width in this range and selecting whatever belt speed is required to achieve the required flow rate. Figure 1 shows an example of c

15、ombinations of belt speed and belt width to achieve Specific conveyor capacities. In this example it is assumed that the bulk density is 850 kg/m3 (coal) and that the trough angle and the surcharge angle are 35' and 20' respectively. Figure 1: Belt width versus belt speed for different capacities

16、. Belt speed selection is however limited by practical considerations. A first aspect is the troughability of the belt. In Figure 1 there is no relation with the required belt strength (rating), which partly depends on the conveyor length and elevation. The combination of belt width and strength mu

17、st be chosen such that good troughability of the belt is ensured. If the troughability is not sufficient then the belt will not track properly. This will result in unstable running behavior of the belt, in particular at high belt speeds, which is not acceptable. Normally, belt manufacturers expect a

18、 sufficiently straight run if approximately 40% of the belt width when running empty, makes contact with the carrying idlers. Approximately 10% should make tangential contact with the center idler roll. A second aspect is the speed of the air relative to the speed of the bulk solid material on the

19、belt (relative airspeed). If the relative airspeed exceeds certain limits then dust will develop. This is in particular a potential problem in mine shafts where a downward airflow is maintained for ventilation purposes. The limit in relative airspeed depends on ambient conditions and bulk material c

20、haracteristics. A third aspect is the noise generated by the belt conveyor system. Noise levels generally increase with increasing belt speed. In residential areas noise levels are restricted to for example 65 dB. Although noise levels are greatly affected by the design of the conveyor support stru

21、cture and conveyor covers, this may be a limiting factor in selecting the belt speed. 2.2 BELT SPEED VARIATION The energy consumption of belt conveyor systems varies with variation of the belt speed, as will be shown in Section 3. The belt velocity can be adjusted with bulk material flow supplied

22、at the loading point to save energy. If the belt is operating at full tonnage then it should run at the high (design) belt speed. The belt speed can be adjusted (decreased) to the actual material (volume) flow supplied at the loading point. This will maintain a constant filling of the belt trough an

23、d a constant bulk material load on the belt. A constant filling of the belt trough yields an optimum loading-ratio, and lower energy consumption per unit of conveyed material may be expected. The reduction in energy consumption will be at least 10% for systems where the belt speed is varied compared

24、 to systems where the belt speed is kept constant [8]. Varying the belt speed with supplied bulk material flow has the following advantages: · Less belt wear at the loading areas · Lower noise emission · Improved operating behavior as a result of better belt alignment and the avoidance of belt l

25、ifting in concave curve by reducing belt tensions Drawbacks include: · Investment cost for controllability of the drive and brake systems · Variation of discharge parabola with belt speed variation · Control system required for controlling individual conveyors in a conveyor system · Constant h

26、igh belt pre-tension · Constant high bulk material load on the idler rolls An analysis should be made of the expected energy savings to determine whether it is worth the effort of installing a more expensive, more complex conveyor system. 3 ENERGY CONSUMPTION Clients may request a specification

27、of the energy consumption of a conveyor system, for example quantified in terms of maximum kW-hr/ton/km, to transport the bulk solid material at the design specifications over the projected route. For long overland systems, the energy consumption is mainly determined by the work done to overcome the

28、 indentation rolling resistance [9]. This is the resistance that the belt experiences due to the visco-elastic (time delayed) response of the rubber belt cover to the indentation of the idler roll. For in-plant belt conveyors, work done to overcome side resistances that occur mainly in the loading a

29、rea also affects the energy consumption. Side resistances include the resistance due to friction on the side walls of the chute and resistance that occurs due to acceleration of the material at the loading point. The required drive power of a belt conveyor is determined by the sum of the total fric

30、tional resistances and the total material lift. The frictional resistances include hysteresis losses, which can be considered as viscous (velocity dependent) friction components. It does not suffice to look just at the maximum required drive power to evaluate whether or not the energy consumption of

31、 a conveyor system is reasonable. The best method to compare the energy consumption of different transport systems is to compare their transport efficiencies. 3.1 TRANSPORT EFFICIENCY There are a number of methods to compare transport efficiencies. The first and most widely applied method is to co

32、mpare equivalent friction factors such as the DIN f factor. An advantage of using an equivalent friction factor is that it can also be determined for an empty belt. A drawback of using an equivalent friction factor is that it is not a 'pure' efficiency number. It takes into account the mass of the b

33、elt, reduced mass of the rollers and the mass of the transported material. In a pure efficiency number, only the mass of the transported material is taken into account. The second method is to compare transportation cost, either in kW-hr/ton/km or in $/ton/km. The advantage of using the transportat

34、ion cost is that this number is widely used for management purposes. The disadvantage of using the transportation cost is that it does not directly reflect the efficiency of a system. The third and most "pure" method is to compare the loss factor of transport [10]. The loss factor of transport is t

35、he ratio between the drive power required to overcome frictional losses (neglecting drive efficiency and power loss/gain required to raise/lower the bulk material) and the transport work. The transport work is defined as the multiplication of the total transported quantity of bulk material and the a

36、verage transport velocity. The advantage of using loss factors of transport is that they can be compared to loss factors of transport of other means of transport, like trucks and trains. The disadvantage is that the loss factor of transport depends on the transported quantity of material, which impl

37、ies that it can not be determined for an empty belt conveyor. The following are loss factors of transport for a number of transport systems to illustrate the concept: Continuous transport: · Slurry transport around 0.01 · Belt conveyors between 0.01 and 0.1 · Vibratory feeders between 0.1 an

38、d 1 · Pneumatic conveyors around 1 0 Discontinuous transport: · Ship between 0.001 and 0.01 · Train around 0.01 · Truck between 0.05 and 0.1 3.2 INDENTATION ROLLING RESISTANCE For long overland systems, the energy consumption is mainly determined by the work done to overcome the indenta

39、tion rolling resistance. Idler rolls are made of a relatively hard material like steel or aluminum whereas conveyor belt covers are made of much softer materials like rubber or PVC. The rolls therefore indent the belt's bottom-cover when the belt moves over the idler rolls, due to the weight of the

40、belt and bulk material on the belt. The recovery of the compressed parts of the belt's bottom cover will take some time due to its visco-elastic (time dependent) properties. The time delay in the recovery of the belt's bottom cover results in an asymmetrical stress distribution between the belt and

41、the rolls, see Figure 2. This yields a resultant resistance force called the indentation rolling resistance force. The magnitude of this force depends on the visco-elastic properties of the cover material, the radius of the idler roll, the vertical force due to the weight of the belt and the bulk so

42、lid material, and the radius of curvature of the belt in curves in the vertical plane. Figure 2: Asymmetric stress distribution between belt and roll [7]. It is important to know how the indentation rolling resistance depends on the belt velocity to enable selection of a proper belt velocity, [1

43、1]. Figure 3: Loss factor (tanb) of typical cover rubber [7] Firstly, the indentation rolling resistance depends on the vertical load on the belt, which is the sum of the belt and the bulk material weight. If the vertical load on the belt decreases with a factor 2 then the indentation rolling re

44、sistance decreases with a factor 2.52 (2 ^4/3). The bulk load decreases with increasing belt speed assuming a constant capacity. Therefore, the indentation rolling resistance decreases more than proportionally with increasing belt speed. Secondly, the indentation rolling resistance depends on the s

45、ize of the idler rolls. If the roll diameter increases with a factor 2 then the indentation rolling resistance decreases with a factor 1.58 (2 ^2/3). In general the idler roll diameter increases with increasing belt speed to limit the bearing rpm's to maintain acceptable idler life. In that case the

46、 indentation rolling resistance decreases with increasing belt speed. Thirdly, the indentation rolling resistance depends on the visco-elastic properties of the belt's cover material. These properties depend on the deformation rate, see Figure 3. The deformation rate in its turn depends on the size

47、 of the deformation area in the belt's bottom cover (depending on belt and bulk load) and on the belt speed. In general the indentation rolling resistance increases with increasing deformation rate (and thus belt speed), but only to a relatively small account. Fourthly, the indentation rolling resi

48、stance depends on the belt's bottom cover thickness. If the bottom cover thickness increases with a factor 2 then the indentation rolling resistance increases with a factor 1.26 (2 ^1/3). if a bottom cover is increased to account for an increase in belt wear with increasing belt speed, then the inde

49、ntation rolling resistance increases as well. It should be realized that the indentation rolling resistance, although important, is not the only velocity dependent resistance. The rolling resistance of the idler rolls for example depends on the vertical load as well as on their rotational speed. Th

50、e effect of the vertical load, which directly depends on the belt speed, is large. The effect of the rotational speed is much smaller. Another resistance occurs due to acceleration of the bulk solid material at the loading point. This resistance increases quadratically with an increase in belt speed

51、 assuming that the bulk material falls straight onto the belt. This will affect smaller, in plant belt conveyors in particular. EXAMPLE To illustrate the concept discussed above lets consider a 6 km long conveyor belt with a capacity of 5000 TPH. The trough angle, the surcharge angle and the bulk

52、density are again taken 35', 20' and 850 kg/m^3 respectively. Figure 4 shows the required belt speed as a function of the belt width to achieve the required capacity of 5000 TPH. This figure is somewhat similar to Figure 1. Figure 4 The figures 5 and 6 show the required belt strength and the req

53、uired drive power as a function of the belt speed. The required belt strength decreases and the required drive power slowly increases with increasing belt speed as can be seen in those figures. Figure 7 shows the loss factor of transport and the DIN f factor versus belt speed. The loss factor of tra

54、nsport is always higher than the DIN f factor because the DIN f factor takes the mass of the belt into account (in the denominator) whereas the loss factor of transport only accounts for the mass of the bulk solid material. Intuitively, it may be expected that there will be an economically optimum b

55、elt speed in the high belt speed range. The determination of the optimum belt speed however, requires more information and is beyond the scope of this paper. Figure 5 Figure 6 Figure 7 3.3 RUBBER COMPOUNDS The indentation rolling resistance depends on the visco-elastic properties of the b

56、elt's bottom cover as discussed in the preceding section. This implies that the rolling resistance can be decreased by selecting a special low indentation rolling resistance (rubber) compound that is available on the market today. A small premium has to be paid for this special compound, but costs c

57、an be limited by applying it for the bottom cover only and using a normal wear-resistant compound for the carrying top cover. In that case turnovers are required to fully use the energy saving function of the bottom compound. A Quantitative indication of the level of indentation rolling resistance

58、is the indentation rolling resistance indicator tan/E ^1/3, where tan is the loss angle and E' the storage modulus of the compound. Compounds with a reasonable indentation rolling resistance performance have indicators below 0.1. Figure 8 shows these indicators for typical medium to good performing

59、rubbers. As can be seen in that figure, the choice for a specific rubber compound affects the energy consumption of the belt conveyor, in particular as a function of the ambient temperature. One comment (warning) must be made. A special belt with low indentation rolling resistance compound should n

60、ever be selected if only one conveyor belt manufacturer offers it. In that case the conveyor system can only perform in accordance with its design specifications when that specific belt is used. It is much better, also cost wise, to specify the upper limit of the resistance indicator as given above

61、that can be met by more than one conveyor belt manufacturer. Figure 8: Indentation rolling resistance indicators for four?different rubbers as a function of temperature. 4. SAFETY FACTOR REQUIREMENTS For design purposes, standards like DIN 22101, ISO 5048 and CEMA provide safety factors (SF) th

62、at limit the permissible belt loads. Two types of safety factors can be distinguished: safety factors on the steady-state running tensions and safety factors on the non-stationary tensions. In general the safety factor on the steady-state running tension is based on: (1) Stationary (full and empty,

63、 summer and winter) and non-stationary belt tensions (2) Belt tensions from extra resistances and deformations in horizontal and vertical curves, troughing transitions, belt turnovers, on pulleys etc. (3) Belt conveyor system maintenance (4) Belt conveyor system operational data including hours p

64、er day, days per year and years of service (5) Belt splice design and fatigue characteristics including those of the belt tensile carrying member (steel cords or fabric) and the rubber (6) Splice kit storage and handling. All these six items should be taken into account when determining the safet

65、y factor. standards like the DIN standard base the recommended safety factor on reduction factors. DIN 22101 uses three reduction factors. The first (r0) generally accounts for the reduction of the strength of the belt (splices) due to fatigue. The second (r1) accounts for the extra forces that act

66、 on the belt in transition zones and on pulleys etc. The third (r2) accounts for the extra dynamic stresses in the belt during starting and stopping. The required minimum safety factor can be calculated as follows: SF=1/(1-(r0+r1+r2)) (1) The DIN standard also gives values for the three reduction factors. For example, for a steel cord conveyor belt under "normal" operational conditions the values are as follows: r0>0.665, r1>0.15, r2>0.06, which yields a safety factor SF>8. Although much can