《教育經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)課程大綱》由會(huì)員分享，可在線閱讀，更多相關(guān)《教育經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)課程大綱（12頁珍藏版）》請(qǐng)?jiān)谘b配圖網(wǎng)上搜索。

73123409 2015年春季學(xué)期 劉子瑜 講師 中國農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)人文與發(fā)展學(xué)院 劉子瑜 講師 辦公室：中國農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)西校區(qū)主樓622室 聯(lián)系電話：13810935961 電子信箱：liuziyu@cau.edu.cn 助教：無 教育經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué) 課程大綱 課程號(hào)：73123409 上課時(shí)間：周一5-6節(jié)，14:00-15:50 上課地點(diǎn)：西校區(qū)，新教2115 課程簡介： 教育經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)是教育經(jīng)濟(jì)與管理專業(yè)碩士研究生的必修課程。主要探討與教育相關(guān)的經(jīng)濟(jì)問題，包括三大模塊，教育成本與收益（含人力資本理論、教育篩選理論、教育的社會(huì)與其他功能、教育收益—成本分析等內(nèi)容）、教育財(cái)政與規(guī)劃（含教育公平、擇校與入學(xué)問題、）、學(xué)生學(xué)業(yè)成就及其影響因素等內(nèi)容，學(xué)校財(cái)政及撥款制度，教育問責(zé)，教育均等與教育公平，教師勞動(dòng)力市場，人力資本投資，教育成本與收益，學(xué)費(fèi)、學(xué)業(yè)貸款和獎(jiǎng)助學(xué)金，教育與社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長，發(fā)展中國家的教育投資等問題。本課程開設(shè)目的有三：第一，了解和學(xué)習(xí)使用相關(guān)理論（教育學(xué)、公共經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)、勞動(dòng)經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)、宏觀經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)、組織理論等）來探索教育問題的方法；第二，熟悉實(shí)證研究的范式和一般特征；第三，引導(dǎo)學(xué)生理解并開展原創(chuàng)性研究。 先修要求： 為更好地理解本課程內(nèi)容，學(xué)生應(yīng)對(duì)微觀經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)（Microeconomics）、線性回歸（Univariate Regression）有所掌握，對(duì)多元回歸（Multiple Regression）有所了解。課程涉及大量英文文獻(xiàn)，學(xué)生應(yīng)具備基本的閱讀專業(yè)文獻(xiàn)的能力。 課程考核： 本課程評(píng)成績共計(jì)100分，60分及格，成績由四部分構(gòu)成： 1. 出勤分，共16分。每次課程凡按時(shí)到課、不早退者可得1分。遲到、早退者得0.5分。缺勤者得0分。學(xué)生有兩次請(qǐng)假機(jī)會(huì)，請(qǐng)假者計(jì)0.5分。其他情形可酌情與教師商定； 2. 課堂表現(xiàn)，共24分。由教師對(duì)學(xué)生課堂討論的表現(xiàn)進(jìn)行打分，從優(yōu)秀到較差分別為1.5分、1分、0.5分，未到課學(xué)生原則上不能獲得該項(xiàng)分?jǐn)?shù)； 3. 文獻(xiàn)綜述，共10分。在本課中，學(xué)生應(yīng)自行擬定一個(gè)學(xué)術(shù)問題，并開展獨(dú)立研究。任何研究的起點(diǎn)，都應(yīng)是對(duì)已有研究的回顧和評(píng)論。這是文獻(xiàn)綜述的意義和主要內(nèi)容。教師會(huì)提供一篇范例文獻(xiàn)綜述。學(xué)生應(yīng)在學(xué)期當(dāng)中完成文獻(xiàn)綜述，并于5月3日提交給教師。文獻(xiàn)綜述按照全面、可信、有價(jià)值三項(xiàng)原則進(jìn)行評(píng)價(jià)，即文獻(xiàn)綜述應(yīng)當(dāng)回顧全部（至少大部分）重要的相關(guān)文獻(xiàn)，并如實(shí)地將已有研究的方法、數(shù)據(jù)、結(jié)論等要點(diǎn)呈現(xiàn)在行文中，最終給出有價(jià)值的評(píng)論和分析。 4. 期末論文草稿，共10分。為保證學(xué)生能夠順利開展研究，其論文草稿應(yīng)當(dāng)在6月7日提交給任課教師。論文草稿應(yīng)當(dāng)格式規(guī)范、論證充分、有改進(jìn)空間。 5. 自主研究展示，共10分。學(xué)生在最后一次課程中進(jìn)行自主研究展示，向其他同學(xué)呈現(xiàn)自己研究的研究問題、研究設(shè)計(jì)、數(shù)據(jù)與方法、主要結(jié)論、延伸討論等部分內(nèi)容。 6. 期末論文定稿，共30分。學(xué)生應(yīng)在6月30日提交自主研究論文的最終定稿。按照格式與引用、原創(chuàng)性、論證等原則進(jìn)行評(píng)價(jià)。 授課方式： 研究生學(xué)習(xí)與本科學(xué)習(xí)相比，具有更多自主的、探究的、研討的特征。本課程也會(huì)遵循這一原則，為學(xué)生提供足夠的自主學(xué)習(xí)、探究學(xué)習(xí)、研討學(xué)習(xí)的空間與時(shí)間。 本課程共計(jì)16次課，每次2學(xué)時(shí)。其中，第七講、第十三講和第十六講為討論課，教師在課堂上不講授內(nèi)容，僅負(fù)責(zé)引導(dǎo)學(xué)生展開討論、辯論或展示。另外十三次講授課中，也會(huì)安排一定比重的時(shí)間供學(xué)生講評(píng)文獻(xiàn)或討論課程內(nèi)容。 課程其他規(guī)定： 病假與事假：原則上，學(xué)期中只允許學(xué)生有兩次病假或事假，特殊情況可以酌情放寬，缺勤 遲到與早退都會(huì)扣除分?jǐn)?shù)； 作業(yè)提交規(guī)定：原則上，所有作業(yè)（包括文獻(xiàn)列表、期末論文草稿和期末論文定稿）都必須通過email在規(guī)定日期的17:00前提交。 答疑時(shí)間：本課程不設(shè)規(guī)定的答疑時(shí)間，學(xué)生可通過電話或郵件聯(lián)系教師，預(yù)約答疑。 聯(lián)系方式：最好通過電子郵件方式聯(lián)系教師，教師會(huì)盡量快速回復(fù)。 第一講 教育經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)導(dǎo)論 學(xué)習(xí)目標(biāo)：了解教育經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的學(xué)科發(fā)展歷史，理解教育經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的學(xué)科性質(zhì)和研究對(duì)象，理解教育經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的研究對(duì)象和研究方法，初步知曉教育經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的研究成果，明確教育經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的意義與作用。 l 核心閱讀 n H. Levin. Mapping the Economics of Education. An Introductory Essay. Educational Researcher, 18(4):13–73, 1989. l 擴(kuò)展閱讀 n 張人杰. 國外教育社會(huì)學(xué)基本文選. 華東大學(xué)出版社. n 閔維方,丁小浩. 對(duì)我國高等教育經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)研究的回顧和展望[J]. 高等教育研究,1999,03:9-14. n 汪丁丁. 探索面向21世紀(jì)的教育哲學(xué)與教育經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)[J]. 高等教育研究,2001,01:35-40+48. n 王善邁. 關(guān)于教育經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)對(duì)象與方法的思考[J]. 北京師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版),2006,01:28-32. n 寧本濤. 教育經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)研究方法的反思[J]. 教育與經(jīng)濟(jì),2006,01:42-45. n 曾滿超,魏新. 西方教育經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué):過去、現(xiàn)在與未來[J]. 教育研究,1997,04:29-37+49. 第二講 人力資本理論與教育回報(bào) 學(xué)習(xí)目標(biāo)：了解人力資本的發(fā)展、基本概念、性質(zhì)特點(diǎn)和主要內(nèi)容，理解教育的人力資本價(jià)值。 l 核心閱讀 n 亞當(dāng)斯密. 國富論. 第十章第一節(jié)“論工資與利潤隨勞動(dòng)與資本用途的不同而不同” n G. Becker. Investment in human capital: A theoretical analysis. The Journal of Political Economy, 70(5):9–49, 1962. l 擴(kuò)展閱讀 n T.W. Schultz. 1975. “The Value of the Ability to Deal with Disequilibria,” Journal of Economic Literature, 827-846. n O. Malamud and A. Wozniak 2012.. "The Impact of College on Migration Evidence from the Vietnam Generation," Journal of Human Resources, 47.4, pp. 913-950. n S. Black, P. Devereux, K. Salvanes 2005.. "Why the Apple Doesn’t Fall Far: Understanding Intergenerational Transmission of Human Capital," American Economic Review, 95.1, pp. 437-449. n O. Ashenfelter and A. Krueger 1994. “Estimates of the Economic Returns to Schooling from a New Sample of Twins,” American Economic Review. Vol. 84.5, pp. 1157-73. n 劉雯,唐紹欣. 西方人力資本理論的新發(fā)展述評(píng)[J]. 經(jīng)濟(jì)科學(xué),1998,04:95-103. n 王開國,宗兆昌. 論人力資本性質(zhì)與特征的理論淵源及其發(fā)展[J]. 中國社會(huì)科學(xué),1999,06:33-46. n 胡鋒. 國內(nèi)人力資本理論研究綜述[J]. 中國人力資源開發(fā),2002,02:24-26. n 楊明洪. 論西方人力資本理論的研究主線與思路[J]. 經(jīng)濟(jì)評(píng)論,2001,01:90-92. n 謝奕,林玳玳. 人力資本理論的形成與發(fā)展[J]. 中國人力資源開發(fā),2001,02:8-9+25. n 江濤. 舒爾茨人力資本理論的核心思想及其啟示[J]. 揚(yáng)州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版),2008,06:84-87. 第三講 人力資本理論的競爭者 學(xué)習(xí)目標(biāo)：了解20世紀(jì)70年代左右研究者對(duì)人力資本理論的批判，以及新理論的內(nèi)涵與特質(zhì)，了解相關(guān)理論在中國的驗(yàn)證。 l 核心閱讀 n M. Spence. Job Market Signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3):355–374, 1973. n 郭叢斌. 二元制勞動(dòng)力市場分割理論在中國的驗(yàn)證[J]. 清華大學(xué)教育研究,2004,04:43-49. l 擴(kuò)展閱讀 n F. Martorell and D. Clark 2010. "The Signalling Value of a High School Diploma," Rand Working Paper 780. n 賴德勝. 勞動(dòng)力市場分割與大學(xué)畢業(yè)生失業(yè)[J]. 北京師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版),2001,04:69-76. n 郭叢斌,丁小浩. 職業(yè)代際效應(yīng)的勞動(dòng)力市場分割與教育的作用[J]. 經(jīng)濟(jì)科學(xué),2004,03:74-82. n 葛蘇勤. 勞動(dòng)力市場分割理論的最新進(jìn)展[J]. 經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)動(dòng)態(tài),2000,12:53-56. n 吳一丁,毛克貞. 篩選理論、教育成本與高等教育體制[J]. 經(jīng)濟(jì)體制改革,2006,02:174-177. n 余華義. 從篩選理論的觀點(diǎn)看擴(kuò)招對(duì)畢業(yè)生就業(yè)的影響[J]. 理論與改革,2006,03:88-91. n 劉澤云. 篩選理論的經(jīng)驗(yàn)驗(yàn)證:方法與結(jié)論[J]. 比較教育研究,2009,01:27-32. n J. Betts 1998. “The Impact of Educational Standards on the Level and Distribution of Earnings,”American Economic Review, Vol. 88.1 (March), pp. 266-75. n J. Tyler, R. Murnane, and J. Willett. Estimating the Labor Market Signaling Value of the GED. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(2):431–468, 2000. 第四講 教育與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長 學(xué)習(xí)目標(biāo)：理解教育與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長、教育與技術(shù)進(jìn)步、教育與社會(huì)，以及與就業(yè)、資源利用、實(shí)際收入水平、收入分配結(jié)構(gòu)等的關(guān)系。 l 核心閱讀 n A. Krueger and M. Lindahl. Education for Growth: Why and For Whom? Journal of Economic Literature, 39(4):1101–1136, 2001. n 蔡增正. 教育對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長貢獻(xiàn)的計(jì)量分析——科教興國戰(zhàn)略的實(shí)證依據(jù)[J]. 經(jīng)濟(jì)研究,1999,02:41-50. l 擴(kuò)展閱讀 n M. Kremer and E. Miguel. 2001. “Worms: Education and Health Externalities in Kenya,” NBER Working Paper No. 8481. n C. Hoxby. 2008. "School Spending, Income, and Inequality: The Efficient Redistribution Hypothesis," Stanford University manuscript. n A. Banerjee, S. Cole, E. Duflo and L. Linden. 2003. “Improving the Quality of Education in India: Evidence from Three Randomized Experiments,” NBER mimeo. n L. Pritchett. Where Has All the Education Gone? The World Bank Economic Review, 15(3): 367–391, 2001. n 楊俊,李雪松. 教育不平等、人力資本積累與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長:基于中國的實(shí)證研究[J]. 數(shù)量經(jīng)濟(jì)技術(shù)經(jīng)濟(jì)研究,2007,02:37-45. n 丁小浩,陳良焜. 高等教育擴(kuò)大招生對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長和增加就業(yè)的影響分析[J]. 教育發(fā)展研究,2000,02:9-14. n 徐舒. 技術(shù)進(jìn)步、教育收益與收入不平等[J]. 經(jīng)濟(jì)研究,2010,09:79-92+108. n 文東茅. 家庭背景對(duì)我國高等教育機(jī)會(huì)及畢業(yè)生就業(yè)的影響[J]. 北京大學(xué)教育評(píng)論,2005,03:58-63. n 曾滿超,丁延慶. 中國義務(wù)教育資源利用及配置不均衡研究[J]. 教育與經(jīng)濟(jì),2005,02:34-40. n 賴德勝. 教育、勞動(dòng)力市場與收入分配[J]. 經(jīng)濟(jì)研究,1998,05:43-50. n 楊俊,黃瀟,李曉羽. 教育不平等與收入分配差距:中國的實(shí)證分析[J]. 管理世界,2008,01:38-47+187. 第五講 教育收益—成本分析（上） 學(xué)習(xí)目標(biāo)：理解教育收益、教育成本的構(gòu)成，并能夠簡單計(jì)算。 l 核心閱讀 n Psacharopoulos, George. "Returns to investment in education: A global update."World development22.9 (1994): 1325-1343. n 盧曉東. 研究生生均教育成本分析[J]. 高等教育研究,2004,05:64-71. l 擴(kuò)展閱讀 n Psacharopoulos, George. "Returns to education: an updated international comparison."Comparative education17.3 (1981): 321-341. n Johnstone, D. Bruce. "The economics and politics of cost sharing in higher education: comparative perspectives."Economics of education review23.4 (2004): 403-410. 楊世忠,許江波,張丹. 作業(yè)成本法在高校教育成本核算中的應(yīng)用研究——基于某高校成本核算的實(shí)例分析[J]. 會(huì)計(jì)研究,2012,04:14-19+94. n 陳國民. 高等學(xué)校教育成本分析[J]. 事業(yè)財(cái)會(huì),2003,02:80-81. 第六講 教育收益—成本分析（下） 學(xué)習(xí)目標(biāo)：理解教育收益率、內(nèi)部收益率的概念，并能簡單計(jì)算。 l 核心閱讀 n Cohn, Elchanan, and Woodrow W. Huches. "A benefit-cost analysis of investment in college education in the United States: 1969–1985."Economics of Education Review13.2 (1994): 109-123. n 周群英. 碩士研究生教育個(gè)人投資成本—收益分析[D].武漢大學(xué),2004. l 擴(kuò)展閱讀 n Villar, Anthony, and Michael Strong. "Is mentoring worth the money? A benefit-cost analysis and five-year rate of return of a comprehensive mentoring program for beginning teachers."ERS Spectrum25.3 (2007): 1-17. n Psacharopoulos, George. "Higher Education in Developing Countries: A Cost-Benefit Analysis. Staff Working Paper No. 440." (1980). n 李實(shí),丁賽. 中國城鎮(zhèn)教育收益率的長期變動(dòng)趨勢[J]. 中國社會(huì)科學(xué),2003,06:58-72+206. n 陳曉宇,閔維方. 我國高等教育個(gè)人收益率研究[J]. 高等教育研究,1998,06:36-40. n 徐瑋斌. 教育成本收益分析:實(shí)證方法探討[J]. 教育與經(jīng)濟(jì),1995,03:27-30. 第七講 討論課：諸理論之比較 學(xué)習(xí)目標(biāo)：閱讀相關(guān)文獻(xiàn)，綜合比較人力資本理論及其競爭理論。 l 核心閱讀 n M. Blaug. Where Are We Now in the Economics of Education? . Economics of Education Review, 4(1):17–28, 1985. n S. Bowles, H. Gintis, and M. Osborne. The determinants of earnings: A behavioral approach. Journal of Economic Literature, 39(4):1137–1176, 2001. n S. Bowles and H. Gintis. Schooling in Capitalist America Revisited. Sociology of Education, 75(1):1–18, 2002. l 擴(kuò)展閱讀 n D. Cutler and A. Lleras-Muney. Education and Health: Evaluating Theories and Evidence. NBER Working Paper, 2006. n R. Haveman and B. Wolfe. Schooling and Economic Well-Being: The Role of Nonmarket Effects. The Journal of Human Resources, 19(3):377–407, 1984. n E. Moretti. Estimating the social return to higher education: evidence from longitudinal and repeated cross-sectional data. Journal of Econometrics, 121(1-2):175–212, 2004. n A. Weiss. Human Capital vs. Signalling Explanations of Wages. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4):133–154, 1995. n P. Arcidiacono, P. Bayer, A. Hizmo 2010. "Beyond Signaling and Human Capital: Education and the Revelation of Ability" American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 2, pp. 76–104. n J. McCrary and H. Royer 2006. "The Effect of Female Education on Fertility and Infant Health: Evidence from School Entry Policies Using Exact Date of Birth" NBER Working Paper 12329. n R. Murnane, J. Willett, and F. Levy. The Growing Importance of Cognitive Skills in Wage Determination. Review of Economics and Statistics, 77(2):251–66, 1995. 第八講 教育公平 學(xué)習(xí)目標(biāo)：理解教育公平的內(nèi)涵，并了解教育公平相關(guān)實(shí)證研究的具體做法。 l 核心閱讀 n C. Jencks. Whom Must We Treat Equally for Educational Opportunity to be Equal? Ethics, 98(3):518–533, 1988. n 石中英. 教育公平的主要內(nèi)涵與社會(huì)意義[J]. 中國教育學(xué)刊,2008,03:1-6+27. l 擴(kuò)展閱讀 n L. Thurow. Education and Economic Equality. Public Interest, 1972. n P. Todd and K. Wolpin. The Production of Cognitive Achievement in Children: Home, School and Racial Test Score Gaps. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania, PIER Working Paper, pages 04–019, 2006. n 楊東平. 對(duì)我國教育公平問題的認(rèn)識(shí)和思考[J]. 教育發(fā)展研究,2000,08:5-8. n 楊東平. 從權(quán)利平等到機(jī)會(huì)均等——新中國教育公平的軌跡[J]. 北京大學(xué)教育評(píng)論,2006,02:2-11+189. n 張長征,郇志堅(jiān),李懷祖. 中國教育公平程度實(shí)證研究:1978-2004——基于教育基尼系數(shù)的測算與分析[J]. 清華大學(xué)教育研究,2006,02:10-14+22. 第九講 入學(xué)與擇校 學(xué)習(xí)目標(biāo)：了解入學(xué)與擇校問題背后的經(jīng)濟(jì)動(dòng)因，并了解中美兩國在此問題上之異同。 l 核心閱讀 n Brown, Phillip. "The ‘Third Wave’: education and the ideology of parentocracy ."British journal of sociology of education11.1 (1990): 65-86. n 文東茅. 我國城市義務(wù)教育階段的擇校及其對(duì)弱勢群體的影響[J]. 北京大學(xué)教育評(píng)論,2006,02:12-23+189. l 擴(kuò)展閱讀 n S. Black. Do Better Schools Matter? Parental Valuation of Elementary Education. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(2):577–599, 1999. n J. Angrist, E. Bettinger, E. Bloom, E. King, and M. Kremer. 2001. “Vouchers for Private Schooling in Colombia: Evidence from a Randomized Natural Experiment,” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 8343. n C. Hoxby. 2003. "School Choice and School Competition: Evidence from the United States," Swedish Economic Policy Review, Vol 10, 9-65. n C. Hoxby and S. Murarka. 2007. "The Effects of New York City’s Charter Schools on Student Achievement," New York City Charter Schools Evaluation Project. n C. Tiebout. A Pure Theory of Local Public Expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64(5): 416–24, 1956. n D. Neal. How Vouchers Could Change the Market for Education. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16(4):25–44, 2002. n H. Ladd. School Vouchers: A Critical View. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16(4):3–24, 2002. n C. Rouse. Schools and Student Achievement: More Evidence from the Milwaukee Parental Choice Program. Industrial Relations Section, Princeton University, 1998. n J. B. Cullen, B. A. Jacob, and S. D. Levitt. The effect of school choice on participants: Evidence from randomized lotteries. Econometrica, 74(5):1191–230, 2006. n C. Hsieh and M. Urquiola. When Schools Compete, How Do They Compete? An Assessment of Chile’s Nationwide School Voucher Program. NBER Working Paper, 2003. n D. Ballou. Pay for performance in public and private schools. Economics of Education Review, 20(1):51–61, 2001. n M. Hoekstra. 2009. "The Effect of Attending the Flagship State University on Earnings: A Discontinuity-Based Approach," Review of Economics and Statistics, 91 (4): 717-724. n Saavedra, Juan Estaban. 2009. "The Learning and Early Labor Market Effects of College Quality: a Regression Discontinuity Analysis." Rand Corporation working paper. http://tinyurl.com/saavedracollrd-pdf. n D. Hamermesh and S. Donald. 2004. "The Effect of College Curriculum on Earnings." NBER Working Paper 10809 (published in Journal of Econometrics, 2008, 144: 479-491). n 曾曉潔. 美國的“擇校制度”與基礎(chǔ)教育改革[J]. 比較教育研究,1997,06:48-52. n 孟令熙. 對(duì)義務(wù)教育階段擇?，F(xiàn)象合理性的思考[J]. 教育探索,2003,09:26-27. n 鄭若玲. 考試公平與區(qū)域公平:高考錄取中的兩難選擇[J]. 高等教育研究,2001,06:53-57. n 張淑鏘,程宏宇. 就近入學(xué)與擇校現(xiàn)象:教育機(jī)會(huì)均等問題淺析[J]. 教育理論與實(shí)踐,2001,01:23-26. n 陳友華,方長春. 社會(huì)分層與教育分流——一項(xiàng)對(duì)義務(wù)教育階段“劃區(qū)就近入學(xué)”等制度安排公平性的實(shí)證研究[J]. 江蘇社會(huì)科學(xué),2007,01:229-235. n 劉海峰. 高考改革的回顧與展望[J]. 教育研究,2007,11:19-24. n 劉曉瑜,潘東明. 高等教育機(jī)會(huì)均等與高考制度改革[J]. 教育研究,2002,02:26-30. n 劉海峰. 高考改革中的公平與效率問題[J]. 教育研究,2002,12:80-84. 第十講 高等教育中的擇校與資助制度 學(xué)習(xí)目標(biāo)：聯(lián)系此前關(guān)于教育收益—成本分析內(nèi)容，理解高等教育中擇校和選專業(yè)的意義，并分析高等教育資助制度的相關(guān)特點(diǎn)。 l 核心閱讀 n M. Hoekstra. 2009. "The Effect of Attending the Flagship State University on Earnings: A Discontinuity-Based Approach," Review of Economics and Statistics, 91 (4): 717-724. n S. Dynarski. 2000. “Hope for Whom? Financial Aid for the Middle Class and Its Impact on College Attendance,” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 7756. l 擴(kuò)展閱讀 n Saavedra, Juan Estaban. 2009. "The Learning and Early Labor Market Effects of College Quality: a Regression Discontinuity Analysis." Rand Corporation working paper. http://tinyurl.com/saavedracollrd-pdf. n D. Hamermesh and S. Donald. 2004. "The Effect of College Curriculum on Earnings." NBER Working Paper 10809 (published in Journal of Econometrics, 2008, 144: 479-491). n M. Wiswall and B. Zafar. 2011. "Determinants of College Major Choice: Identification Using an Information Experiment," Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Report 500. n I. McFarlin. 2006. "Do Public Subsidies Promote College Access and Completion? Evidence from Community College Districts" University of Michigan manuscript. n T. Kane. 2003. “A Quasi-experimental Estimate of the Impact of Financial Aid on College-going,” NBER Working Paper No. 9703. n C. Avery and C. Hoxby. 2003. “Do and Should Financial Aid Packages Affect Students’ College Choices? in College Choices, ed. C. Hoxby. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. n B. Long. 2003. “Does the Format of a Financial Aid Program Matter? The Effect of State In-Kind Tuition Subsidies” NBER Working Paper No. 9720. n S. Peltzman. 1973. “The Effect of Government Subsidies-in-Kind on Private Expenditures: The Case of Higher Education,” Journal of Political Economy. Vol. 81.1 (January/February), pp. 1-27. n J. Scott-Clayton. 2011. “On Money and Motivation: A Quasi-Experimental Analysis of Financial Incentives for College Achievement.” Journal of Human Resources, 46.3: 614-646. n 吳斌珍,鐘笑寒. 高考志愿填報(bào)機(jī)制與大學(xué)招生質(zhì)量:一個(gè)基于擇校機(jī)制理論的經(jīng)驗(yàn)研究[J]. 經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)(季刊),2012,02:765-804. n 肖潔,卜林. 高考考生擇校意愿分析——基于南京工業(yè)大學(xué)08級(jí)新生的調(diào)查[J]. 中國青年研究,2010,01:92-95. n 張建奇. 1983年以來我國大學(xué)生資助的演變[J]. 現(xiàn)代大學(xué)教育,2003,01:69-72. n 葉忠. 論當(dāng)前我國大學(xué)生資助制度的功能[J]. 教育與經(jīng)濟(jì),2000,01:34-36. n 楊克瑞. 大學(xué)生資助的貸款誤區(qū)及政府責(zé)任的實(shí)現(xiàn)[J]. 清華大學(xué)教育研究,2005,04:87-91. 第十一講 高等教育撥款與學(xué)費(fèi) 學(xué)習(xí)目標(biāo)：了解高等教育撥款的不同模式，并理解各國學(xué)費(fèi)變動(dòng)的原因。 l 核心閱讀 n Hoxby, Caroline M. How the changing market structure of US higher education explains college tuition. No. w6323. National Bureau of Economic Research, 1997. n 劉彥偉,胡曉陽. 20世紀(jì)90年代中后期我國普通高等教育經(jīng)費(fèi)來源結(jié)構(gòu)的變動(dòng)[J]. 高等教育研究,2005,06:34-39. l 擴(kuò)展閱讀 n Levidow, Les. "Marketizing higher education: Neoliberal strategies and counter-strategies." (2002): 227-248. n Epple, Dennis, Richard Romano, and Holger Sieg. "Admission, tuition, and financial aid policies in the market for higher education."Econometrica74.4 (2006): 885-928. n Altbach, Philip G., and Jane Knight. "The internationalization of higher education: Motivations and realities."Journal of studies in international education11.3-4 (2007): 290-305. n Winston, Gordon C. "Subsidies, hierarchy and peers: The awkward economics of higher education."The Journal of Economic Perspectives(1999): 13-36. n Berger, Mark C., and Thomas Kostal. "Financial resources, regulation, and enrollment in US public higher education." Economics of Education Review 21.2 (2002): 101-110. n Slaughter, Sheila, and Gary Rhoades.Academic capitalism and the new economy: Markets, state, and higher education. JHU Press, 2004. n 劉向東,張偉,陳英霞. 歐美高等教育機(jī)構(gòu)經(jīng)費(fèi)來源及其啟示[J]. 高等教育研究,2005,05:97-102. n 官風(fēng)華,魏新. 高等教育撥款模式研究[J]. 教育研究,1995,02:23-29. n 陳志勇. 英國高等教育財(cái)政撥款體制研究[D].華中師范大學(xué),2007. n 包海芹. 高等教育學(xué)費(fèi)制度變遷研究[J]. 清華大學(xué)教育研究,2008,02:70-76. 第十二講 教師勞動(dòng)力市場 l 核心閱讀 n 閻鳳橋. 學(xué)術(shù)勞動(dòng)力市場的特性與研究型大學(xué)的教師聘用制度[J]. 北京大學(xué)教育評(píng)論,2005,03:64-69+88. n C. Hoxby and A. Leigh. 2004. "Pulled Away or Pushed Out? Explaining the Decline of Teacher Aptitude in the United States," American Economic Review. Vol 94.2. l 擴(kuò)展閱讀 n S. Corcoran, W. Evans, and R. Schwab. 2004. “Changing Labor Market Opportunities for Women and the Quality of Teachers 1957-1992,” American Economic Review. Vol 94.2. n J. Angrist and J. Guryan. 2004. “Teacher Testing, Teacher Education, and Teacher Characteristics," American Economic Review. Vol 94.2. n T. Kane, J. Rockoff, and D. Staiger. 2005. "Teacher Quality and Alternative Teacher Certification," NBER Conference Paper. n B. Jacob. 2007. "Do Principals Fire the Worse Teachers? An Examination of the Non-Renewal Policy in the Chicago Public Schools" NBER Conference Paper. n D. Ballou and M. Podursky 1997. “What Went Wrong,” Chapter 4 in Teacher Pay and Teacher Quality. Kalamazoo MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, pp. 53-86. n C.M. Hoxby 1996. "The Effects of Teachers Unions on Education Production" Quarterly Journal of Economics. n D. Lakdawalla. 2001. “The Declining Quality of Teachers,” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 8263. n T. Kane, D. Staiger, S. Cantrell, J. Fullerton 2007. "National Board Certification and Teacher Effectiveness: Evidence from a Random Assignment Experiment" NBER conference paper. n S. Loeb and M. Page. Examining the Link between Teacher Wages and Student Outcomes: The Importance of Alternative Labor Market Opportunities and Non-Pecuniary Variation. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 82(3):393–408, 2000. n S. Corcoran, W. Evans, and R. Schwab. Changing Labor-Market Opportunities for Women and the Quality of Teachers, 1957-2000. The American Economic Review, 94(2):230–235, 2004. n H. Lankford, S. Loeb, and J. Wyckoff. Teacher Sorting and the Plight of Urban Schools: A Descriptive Analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(1):37, 2002. n V. Lavy. Performance Pay and Teachers’ Effort, Productivity and Grading Ethics. NBER Working Paper, 2004. n D. Ballou. Pay for performance in public and private schools. Economics of Education Review, 20(1):51–61, 2001. n R. Murnane and D. Cohen. Merit Pay and the Evaluation Problem: Why Most Merit Pay Plans Fail and a Few Survive. Harvard Educational Review, 56(1):1–17, 1986. n 丁厲,劉匯琳. 我國高校教師勞動(dòng)力市場的薪酬分析[J]. 清華大學(xué)教育研究,2009,03:71-77. n 陳堅(jiān),陳陽. 我國城鄉(xiāng)教師流動(dòng)失衡的制度分析[J]. 教育發(fā)展研究,2008,Z1:34-37. 第十三講 討論課：教育規(guī)劃 l 核心閱讀 n A MASTER PLAN for HIGHER EDUCATION IN CALIFORNIA n 國家中長期教育改革和發(fā)展規(guī)劃綱要(2010—2020) n 北京市中長期教育改革和發(fā)展規(guī)劃綱要(2010—2020) l 擴(kuò)展閱讀 n 道格拉斯[美]. 周作宇[譯]. 加利福尼亞思想與美國高等教育：1850-1960年的總體規(guī)劃. 教育科學(xué)出版社, 2007. 第十四講 學(xué)業(yè)成就及其影響因素（上） 學(xué)習(xí)目標(biāo)：理解早期教育、同群效應(yīng)、班級(jí)規(guī)模對(duì)學(xué)生學(xué)業(yè)成就的影響。 l 核心閱讀 n P. McEwan and J. Shapiro. The Benefits of Delayed Primary School Enrollment: Discontinuity Estimates Using Exact Birth Dates. Journal of Human Resources, 2008. n B. Sacerdote. Peer Effects with Random Assignment: Results for Dartmouth Roommates. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 681, 2001. n A. Krueger. Economic Considerations and Class Size. Economic Journal, 2003. l 擴(kuò)展閱讀 n J. Currie. Early Childhood Education Programs. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(2):213–238, 2001. n J. J. Heckman and D. V. Masterov. The productivity argument for investing in young children. NBER Working Paper 13016, April 2007. n A. Datar. Does delaying kindergarten entrance give children a head start? Economics of Education Review, 25(1):43–62, 2006. n K. Bedard and E. Dhuey. The Persistence of Early Childhood Maturity: International Evidence of Long-Run Age Effects. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1437, 2006. n P. Fredriksson and B. ckert. Is Early Learning Really More Productive? the Effect of School Starting Age on School and Labor Market Performance. IZA Working Paper, 2005. n T. E. Elder and D. H. Lubotsky. Kindergarten entrance age and children’s achievement: Impacts of state policies, family background, and peers. Working Paper, June 2006. n G. Akerlof and R. Kranton. Identity and Schooling: Some Lessons for the Economics of Education. Jou